News & Analysis as of

Asbestos Litigation Litigation Strategies

DRI

[Event] Asbestos Medicine Seminar - November 15th - 17th, Austin, TX

DRI on

Join us in Austin, Texas, for the DRI Asbestos Medicine Seminar, where you will learn about the biggest challenges and opportunities facing practitioners in asbestos litigation. This year’s educational focus will involve...more

Goldberg Segalla

Supplier’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Causation Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In this asbestos action, defendant Dykes Lumber moved for summary judgment, arguing it established a prima facie case for lack of causation under Nemeth v. Brenntag....more

Goldberg Segalla

Talc Supplier’s Motion for Summary Judgment Denied as to Causation, Granted as to Punitive Damages

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, Erie County - In this asbestos matter, plaintiffs claimed that decedent, Jeffrey Campise, was exposed to asbestos through consumer talcum powder products. Plaintiffs filed suit against a...more

Goldberg Segalla

Clutch Manufacturer Obtains Summary Judgment on Medical Causation Grounds

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County - In this asbestos action, plaintiff Donna Daniell alleged asbestos exposure from working near auto mechanics, including her husband, Robert, while they used...more

Goldberg Segalla

Turbine Manufacturer’s Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion Testimony Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

U.S.  District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Decedent James Grant Gooding was employed at various shipyards in Louisiana between 1970 and 1979. On March 4, 2020, he filed suit against a variety of premises...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Key Issues in the U.S. Asbestos (and Talc) Tort System in 2023

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The national asbestos litigation machine is running at full speed even though the system is more than five decades old. The machine is national in scope, but it only operates in relatively few state and county jurisdictions....more

Goldberg Segalla

Asbestos Supplier’s Motion Seeking Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict and New Trial Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

State of New York, Supreme Court, County of Niagara, November 4, 2022 - Plaintiffs Benedict Viglietta and Terri Viglietta alleged that Mr. Viglietta developed mesothelioma as a result of his exposure to asbestos while...more

Goldberg Segalla

Third-Parties Prevail on Summary Judgment Thanks to Employer’s Lack of Evidence

Goldberg Segalla on

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, October 24, 2022 - Plaintiff Ronald John Falgout, as the independent executor and successor of decedent Ruby Lee Marie Falgout, brought this action in October...more

Goldberg Segalla

Talcum Powder Defendant Fails to Meet Summary Judgment Burden on Medical Causation

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of New York, New York County, September 22, 2022 - In this NYCAL action, Decedent Maryann Purser (“Decedent”) alleged that she developed pleural mesothelioma through the use of Cashmere Bouquet talcum...more

Goldberg Segalla

Naval Expert’s Testimony Limited on Duty to Warn Issue

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, September 29, 2022 - The Callen Cortez (“Plaintiff”) matter has been previously reported by the Asbestos Case Tracker. At current issue is the...more

Goldberg Segalla

Micarta Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment against third-party plaintiff Avondale denied

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, September 6, 2022 - Plaintiff Ora Adams alleges that her husband, Lional Adams, was exposed to asbestos at defendant, Avondale’s, New Orleans area...more

Goldberg Segalla

District Court Denies Motion to Strike Expert Testimony

Goldberg Segalla on

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, August 23, 2022 - Decedent Callen Cortez sued defendant Hopeman Brothers Inc., among others, claiming that alleged asbestos exposures caused him to develop...more

Goldberg Segalla

NYCAL Decisions Denying Summary Judgment to Floor Tile Manufacturer Reversed

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, July 19, 2022 - On July 19, 2022, the First Department reversed three New York City Asbestos Litigation (“NYCAL”) decisions that denied summary judgment to...more

Goldberg Segalla

NYCAL Verdict Against Talc Product Manufacturer Reversed on Causation Grounds

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, July 19, 2022 - In 2017, Plaintiff Donna Olson (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (J&J), claiming that her lifelong use of J&J talcum powder...more

Maron Marvel

When Sooner is Better Than Later – Expert Retention in Environmental Litigation

Maron Marvel on

Causation is a vital component of any environmental or toxic tort lawsuit. The idea of causation requires that a plaintiff show a causal connection between their injury and the defendant's action to ensure remedies for the...more

Goldberg Segalla

New York Manages to Remain a “Judicial Hellhole” in 2021

Goldberg Segalla on

While trials and in person court conferences are starting to trickle in, some jurisdictions such as New York still managed to hold its position as a judicial hellhole in 2021. According to American Tort Reform Foundation...more

Hogan Lovells

Dring v Cape: open justice not open access

Hogan Lovells on

The High Court's decision in Dring v Cape has set out a new balancing test for third party access to documents disclosed during litigation. The new approach should provide some comfort to defendants that are subject to...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Toxic Tort Monitor: Iowa Enacts Over-Naming Law

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Iowa became the first state to enact a law addressing the over-naming of defendants in asbestos litigation this month. Signed June 1, the new law requires a plaintiff to file a sworn affidavit, in addition to the initial...more

Carlton Fields

Attention All Co-Defendants: Make Your Own Objections, Don’t Rely on a Co-Defendant

Carlton Fields on

A recent Pennsylvania case presents the question: can a party rely on its co-defendant’s objections at trial, or must it join in an objection or make its own? In Amato v. Bell & Gossett, 116 A. 3d 607 (Pa. Super 2015),...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide