News & Analysis as of

Asbestos Take-Home Exposure Negligence

Husch Blackwell LLP

Washington Court Finds No Take-Home Exposure in Asbestos Bench Trial

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In Perkins v. United States, Plaintiff Tristan Perkins sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for her mother Geraldine Perkins’ (“Decedent”) alleged wrongful death due to asbestos exposure. Alleging...more

Goldberg Segalla

Court Denies Plaintiff’s Attempt to Reinstate Prior Claim of Post 1969 Exposure

Goldberg Segalla on

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana - Plaintiff Robert Stephen Sentilles was diagnosed with mesothelioma in October 2020. He filed his suit asserting negligence and strict liability claims against...more

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiff unable to provide any legitimate evidence against motions for summary judgment

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court of the District of Nevada, September 19, 2022 - The plaintiff commenced this action in early 2020 by filing his Complaint against 13 defendants.  He suffers from mesothelioma and alleged...more

Maron Marvel

Jurisdictional Analysis Shows Divide on Duty for Take-Home Asbestos Exposure

Maron Marvel on

Jurisdictions are divided on the issue of whether there is a duty in take-home asbestos exposure cases, and while the majority of the states have not specifically addressed the issue in the asbestos exposure context, of those...more

Blank Rome LLP

The Next Wave of Asbestos Litigation: Examining the Duty of Care in Take-Home/ Secondary Asbestos Exposure Claims

Blank Rome LLP on

The Rise of Take-Home or Secondary Exposure Asbestos Claims - Take-home asbestos claims are asserted by or on behalf of individuals who claim an asbestos-related injury arising from exposure to asbestos fibers through...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Supreme Court Of Virginia Recognizes Employer Liability For “Take Home” Exposure

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Recently, a divided Supreme Court of Virginia, in a 4-3 decision, recognized an employer’s liability for “take home” exposure. In Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Inc., 818 S.E.2d 805 (Va. 2018), the Supreme Court held that...more

Perkins Coie

California Supreme Court Establishes Duty in Take-Home Asbestos Exposure Cases

Perkins Coie on

On December 1, 2016, the Supreme Court of California held that the duty of employers and premises owners to exercise ordinary care in their use of asbestos in their businesses includes a duty to take reasonable care to...more

Polsinelli

"Take-Home" Asbestos Case Decision Could have Ripple Effect

Polsinelli on

Companies facing "take-home" asbestos or other toxic tort exposure claims in Arizona, or in other jurisdictions applying Arizona law, now have a new case to cite in dispositive motions. With the Sept. 20 Arizona Court of...more

Polsinelli

Asbestos Exposure Liability Decision May Affect Future "Take Home" Cases

Polsinelli on

Following recent court action, defendants up against "take-home" asbestos exposure claims may need to rethink their legal strategy. The Northern District of Illinois recently denied a Motion for Reconsideration of a...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide