News & Analysis as of

AstraZeneca Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

Venable LLP

The First Biosimilar Disputes at the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Venable LLP on

As the era of biologics and biosimilar litigations heats up in the United States, Europe’s Unified Patent Court (UPC) is also taking center stage with the first two biosimilar disputes filed in March and April....more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - December 2021

Knobbe Martens on

Ranges for Interdependent and Interactive Components Can Be Tricky to Derive - In Modernatx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation, Appeal No. 20-2329, the Federal Circuit held that a presumption of obviousness based on...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Watch - December 2021 #2

WilmerHale on

Precedential Federal Circuit Opinions - TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA v. CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC. [OPINION] (2021-1360, 12/07/2021) (MOORE, NEWMAN, and REYNA) -   Moore, C.J. The Court affirmed the PTAB’s IPR decision...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Mylan Pharm. v. AstraZeneca AB (PTAB 2017)

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office recently issued a Final Written Decision in an inter partes review styled Mylan Pharm. v. AstraZeneca AB affirming the patentability of all challenged...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Timing Is Everything – Meeting the One-Year Filing Deadline for IPR - Lannett Holdings Inc. v. AstraZeneca AB

Addressing the one-year time bar for filing an inter partes review (IPR) petition, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found petitioner’s arguments regarding proper service and jurisdiction unpersuasive and...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide