News & Analysis as of

Automatic Stay › Section 362 › Repossess

McGlinchey Stafford

Repossessions And bankruptcy: What The Fulton Decision Means For Turnover

McGlinchey Stafford on

The February Supreme Court decision in City of Chicago v. Fulton was widely celebrated in the lending community because the court found that a lender who repossesses a vehicle before a borrower files for bankruptcy is not in...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Vehicle Finance Lenders Beware: The Coming Wave Of Post-Fulton Automatic Stay And Turnover Adversary Proceedings

McGlinchey Stafford on

By now, you likely are aware of the recent Supreme Court decision in City of Chicago, Illinois v. Fulton. The Court rightly found that merely retaining possession of a vehicle repossessed pre-petition is not a violation of...more

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,...

Deepening Circuit Split, Third Circuit Holds that Items Seized Pre-Petition Did Not Violate Automatic Stay

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,... on

The Third Circuit has recently held in In re Denby-Peterson, 941 F.3d 115 (3rd Cir. 2019) that creditors who refuse to relinquish an item that was seized pre-petition are not subject to sanctions because their refusal does...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide