News & Analysis as of

Building Permits Environmental Review

Holland & Knight LLP

Adding Fuel to the Fires Calling for Permitting Reform

Holland & Knight LLP on

In a surprise decision likely to add further fuel to the fires calling for permitting reform and uncertainty to the environmental review process for federal funding and approval, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of...more

Downey Brand LLP

Project’s Completion Did Not Moot CEQA Claim

Downey Brand LLP on

Introduction - On March 29, 2024, the First District Court of Appeal issued its partially published opinion in the case of Vichy Springs Resort, Inc. v. City of Ukiah (2024) 101 Cal.App.5th 46....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Exact Compliance with SEQRA Architectural Conditions Are Enforceable

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Recently in BMG Monroe I, LLC v. Village of Monroe Zoning Board of Appeals, the Second Department reinforced strict compliance with all State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) visual impact findings and mitigation...more

Downey Brand LLP

Sixth District Says City’s Specific Plan EIR Need Not Analyze Speculative Alternative Scenario Conjured by Project Opponents

Downey Brand LLP on

The Sixth District Court of Appeal, in Santa Rita Union School District v. City of Salinas (2023), 94 Cal.App.5th 298, reversed the lower court, finding that the City of Salinas’ (“City”) final programmatic environmental...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

California Housing Legislation – 2019 Update

In 2019, the California legislature passed, and Governor Newsom approved, new legislation impacting the development industry. Effective January 1, 2020, the laws summarized in the link below will impact the development...more

Benesch

Trump Administration Proposes New Guidelines for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act

Benesch on

For the first time in over forty years, the White House Council on Environmental Quality (the “CEQ”) is proposing to revise the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) regulations. On January 9, 2020, the Trump...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Village’s Vitiation of Riparian Rights Survives Initial Challenge

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In Akeson v Inc. Vil. of Asharoken, 2019 NY Slip Op 32756(U), Index No. 57/2018 (Sup Ct, Suffolk County 2019), the Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the Incorporated Village of Asharoken’s (“Asharoken”) decisions...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

The Appellate Division, Third Department, Holds a Brewpub May Be an Accessory Use to a Golf Course

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

While the Town of Halfmoon (“Town”) in Saratoga County, New York,  may be far from any given reader, the issues in Micklas v. Town of Halfmoon Planning Board, 170 A.D.3d 1483 (3d Dep’t 2019), are close to the heart: whether a...more

Nossaman LLP

Improper CEQA Determination Does Not Trigger Regulatory Taking

Nossaman LLP on

When a governmental agency improperly denies a permit application for a new development, and the proposed development is thereby delayed, does this result in a regulatory taking? ...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide