News & Analysis as of

California Securities Regulation

Allen Matkins

Want Of Privity Evidence Dooms Class Claims Against Blockchain Company

Allen Matkins on

The California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 generally requires that the offer and sale of a security in an issuer transaction must be qualified unless exempt or not subject to qualification (due to preemption).  Cal....more

Alston & Bird

Sustainability Spotlight – Q1 2024

Alston & Bird on

Welcome to the inaugural edition of the Sustainability Spotlight, your place to keep up with all the ESG action – federal and state enforcement, shareholder proposals and litigation, and state attorney general actions. ...more

Allen Matkins

Does Jarkesy Negate Administrative Penalties Under The California Corporate Securities Law?

Allen Matkins on

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that when the Securities and Exchange Commission seeks civil penalties against a defendant for securities fraud, the Seventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution entitles the...more

Allen Matkins

There Are Four Answers To The Question "Is A Limited Liability Company Interest Is A Security Under California Law?"

Allen Matkins on

The federal securities laws predate by decades the advent of limited liability companies and the statutory definitions of a "security" under those laws has not been updated to address membership interests in LLCs.  California...more

Allen Matkins

Reverse Stock Splits And The California Corporate Securities Law

Allen Matkins on

Meredith Ervine recently wrote about reverse stock splits and Nasdaq listed issuers.  A reverse stock split is the "go to" solution for many listed issuers whose share prices fall below the minimum continued stock exchange...more

Troutman Pepper

The US Attorney's Office for the Central District of California Announces Securities Fraud Task Force

Troutman Pepper on

On October 4, U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Martin Estrada announced the formation of a new task force, the Corporate and Securities Fraud Strike Force....more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

California Poised To Adopt Sweeping Climate Disclosure Rules

In September 2023, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 253, Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and Senate Bill 261, Greenhouse Gases: Climate-Related Financial Risk (SB 261). California Gov. Gavin...more

Allen Matkins

When A 20% Interest May Be a 40% Interest

Allen Matkins on

The possible application of California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 may not be the first thing that comes to mind when amending charter documents.  However, Section 25120 of the California Corporations Code makes it...more

Allen Matkins

California Securities Claims Can Transend Even Death

Allen Matkins on

As has been discussed in previous posts, Part 5 of the Corporation Securities Law of 1968 establishes violations and Part 6 prescribes remedies.  For example, Corporations Code Section 25401 in Part 5 provides, in part, that...more

Allen Matkins

Knowledge Of Restrictions Dooms Stock Transfers

Allen Matkins on

Two California statutes require that restrictions on transfer be included on share certificates.  Section 8204 of the Commercial Code  provides that "[a] restriction on transfer of a security . . . is ineffective against a...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Los Angeles County Trial Court Strikes Down Another California Board Diversity Law

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Last month, on May 13, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that SB 826, which requires publicly held California corporations with a principal executive office in California to follow gender...more

Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

Court Finds California Board Gender Diversity Statute Unconstitutional

On May 13, the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, issued a verdict following a bench trial that effectively struck down SB 826, a California statute requiring the boards of public corporations based in the...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

California Court Rules State Board Diversity Requirement Unconstitutional — Where Do We Go From Here?

Earlier this month, a Los Angeles County Superior Court order put the brakes on one of California’s much contested board diversity requirements, a decision certain to reverberate among the business community and efforts to...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Court Declares California Law Requiring Diverse Corporate Boards Unconstitutional

As discussed in our previous blog, on April 1, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge, Terry Green, granted summary judgment in favor of individuals represented by D.C.-based nonprofit Judicial Watch, declaring Assembly Bill...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

California’s Board Diversity Law Tossed by Judge; Other Board Diversity Efforts Continue

On April 1, 2022, Judge Terry Green of the Los Angeles Superior Court struck down California’s AB 979, which required publicly held companies based in California to have at least one board director from an “underrepresented...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

California’s Board Diversity Law Held Unconstitutional

Assembly Bill 979 (the Bill), signed into law by Gov. Newsom on September 30, 2020, required all public companies with a principal executive office in California to have at least one director from an underrepresented...more

Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP

Pending California Legislation Could Build Upon—Or Conflict With—Forthcoming SEC Disclosure Rules

Proposed legislation currently in the California Senate seeking to impose new reporting requirements for emissions arrives as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is considering climate-related public company...more

Allen Matkins

Court Rules "Thoughtful," "Disciplined," and "Dynamic" Are But Short Blasts Of Wind

Allen Matkins on

Semper Midas Fund, Ltd was formed for to invest primarily in mortgage-related instruments.  Five months after investing over $300,000 in the fund, the Alan Kalin was told that that the fund had lost over 50% of its value. ...more

Allen Matkins

What Does Rule 144 Have To Do With Dissenters Rights?

Allen Matkins on

Shares that otherwise meet California's definition of "dissenting shares" are not dissenting shares if immediately before the reorganization or short-form merger, they are listed on any national securities exchange certified...more

19 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide