News & Analysis as of

Canada Appeals Pharmaceutical Patents

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada to hear method of medical treatment appeal

Smart & Biggar on

On September 19, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada granted Pharmascience leave to appeal a Federal Court of Appeal decision affirming a trial decision that upheld the validity of Janssen’s patent relating to paliperidone...more

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada dismisses Apotex’s application for leave to appeal macitentan inducing infringement decision

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal of a decision relating to macitentan (Janssen’s OPSUMIT), which found that Apotex would induce infringement of Janssen’s patent....more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal affirms paliperidone palmitate claims are not unpatentable methods of medical treatment

Smart & Biggar on

In a 2022 decision involving Janssen and Pharmascience, the Federal Court found that the claims of Canadian Patent No. 2,655,335 (335 patent, relating to paliperidone palmitate (Janssen’s INVEGA SUSTENNA)) were not invalid...more

Smart & Biggar

FCA upholds inducement of infringement findings relating to paliperidone palmitate.

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court released a pair of decisions relating to paliperidone palmitate (Janssen’s INVEGA SUSTENNA), finding in a summary trial that each of Pharmascience and Apotex would induce infringement...more

Smart & Biggar

Twice is not nice – second notice of allegation may be abusive

Smart & Biggar on

On December 23, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) held that it was an abuse of process for Apotex to raise invalidity in defending actions under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations)...more

Smart & Biggar

LUMIGAN RC formulation patent found valid and infringed

Smart & Biggar on

In a patent infringement action brought by Allergan and AbbVie under subsection 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), in relation to 0.01% w/v bimatoprost solution for ophthalmic...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian IP Litigation 2023: Year in Review

Smart & Biggar on

The year 2023 witnessed several developments in Canadian IP litigation. From summary judgment finding its limits to the denial of a permanent injunction for the first time in almost three decades, several cases decided in...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court finds PMPRB reasonably concluded Galderma’s patent claiming 0.3% adapalene “pertained to” 0.1% adapalene DIFFERIN

Smart & Biggar on

On January 11, 2024, the Federal Court released its decision concluding that the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB or Board) was reasonable in its redetermination that the invention of Patent No. 2,478,237 (the 237...more

Smart & Biggar

2023 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

Eli Lilly v Teva, Pharmascience, Riva, Apotex, Mylan (tadalafil, CIALIS) – Following a summary trial, Lilly’s infringement actions were dismissed: composition claims directed to “a physiologically acceptable salt” of...more

Smart & Biggar

FCA dismisses appeal, patent not listable against STELARA SNDS

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court (FC) dismissed Janssen’s application for judicial review of the decision of the Office of Submissions and Intellectual Property (OSIP) refusing to list Canadian Patent No. 3,113,837...more

Smart & Biggar

PM(NOC) Regulations: Six-year anniversary of major amendments

Smart & Biggar on

September 21, 2023, marked the sixth anniversary of the significant amendments to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations). This article provides an update on activities in the sixth year...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal dismisses appeal challenging amended basket of comparator countries in PMPRB Regulations

Smart & Biggar on

On December 5, 2022, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Innovative Medicines Canada (IMC) and sixteen innovative pharmaceutical companies’ appeal regarding the validity of the amended basket of comparator countries...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds invalidity of fampridine patent

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed an appeal by Biogen and a cross-appeal by Taro from a decision of the Federal Court... dismissing two actions by Biogen under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance)...more

Smart & Biggar

Supreme Court of Canada denies leave regarding lisdexamfetamine patent decision

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, Apotex sought leave to appeal a decision of the Federal Court of Appeal (2021 FCA 52) affirming a Federal Court decision finding that the claims of a patent relating to lisdexamfetamine (Shire’s...more

Smart & Biggar

PM(NOC) Regulations: Fourth year following major amendments

Smart & Biggar on

September 21, 2021 marked the fourth anniversary of the significant amendments to the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations). This article provides an update on activities in the fourth year...more

Smart & Biggar

FCA remits pricing decision on ALEXION’S SOLIRIS to PMPRB

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On September 29, 2021, Canada applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39858). In September 2017, the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB or Board) decided (see article here)...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds decision finding Seedlings' LifeCard patent invalid and not infringed by Pfizer’s EpiPen

Smart & Biggar on

On July 28, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Seedling’s appeal from the Federal Court decision of Justice Grammond (2020 FC 1, previously reported), which concluded that certain claims of Seedlings' LifeCard...more

Smart & Biggar

FCA upholds reconsideration decision maintaining $100M+ award against Apotex for cefaclor patent infringement

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On September 28, 2021, Apotex applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39851).  On July 23, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Apotex’s appeal of the Federal Court’s (FC)...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal finds summary trial appropriate, upholds dismissal of ViiV’s action for patent infringement re: Gilead’s...

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On September 15, 2021, ViiV applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal (Docket No. 39823). The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by ViiV from a decision of the Federal Court granting...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court dismisses Roche’s PMNOC Regulations actions against Sandoz re: pirfenidone

Smart & Biggar on

By judgment dated May 12, 2021, the Federal Court dismissed patent infringement actions related to Sandoz’s pirfenidone capsules and tablets for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (Roche’s ESBRIET):...more

Smart & Biggar

Apotex seeks leave to appeal lisdexamfetamine patent decision

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal from a decision holding that the claims of a patent relating to lisdexamfetamine (Shire’s VYVANSE) were valid and prohibiting the Minister of...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal Upholds Decision Allowing Taro to Plead Validity Attacks beyond Notice of Allegation

Smart & Biggar on

On June 9, 2021, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA), following grant of leave to hear Sunovion’s appeal, dismissed Sunovion’s appeal from a Federal Court (FC) decision of Furlanetto J. (2021 FC 37) granting Taro leave to amend...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal finds Minister of Health’s refusal to grant a CSP for SHINGRIX is reasonable

Smart & Biggar on

In the first appellate decision relating to Certificates of Supplementary Protection (CSPs), the Federal Court of Appeal has allowed the appeal of the Minister of Health (the Minister), setting aside the lower court judgment....more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal affirms prohibition order against Apotex regarding abiraterone

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, in the final decision released under the pre-amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (Regulations), the Federal Court granted a prohibition order relating to Canadian Patent No....more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal upholds Federal Court decision finding Shire’s VYVANSE patent valid

Smart & Biggar on

Update: On October 7, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada denied Apotex’s leave to appeal (Apotex v Shire, Docket No. 39662). The Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) recently dismissed an appeal by Apotex from a decision of the...more

84 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide