News & Analysis as of

Causation Asbestos Litigation

Husch Blackwell LLP

U.S. Navy’s Nonadherence to Asbestos Policy Opens Door to Lawsuit

Husch Blackwell LLP on

As a sovereign entity, the United States government is immune from suit unless it consents to be sued. However, its sovereign immunity may be waived under certain circumstances under the Federal Torts Claim Act (“FTCA”),...more

Goldberg Segalla

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Granted Based on Expert Preclusion

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York - Plaintiff Scott Keller alleged that he was exposed to asbestos during his employment on ExxonMobil Oil Company vessels and that he developed...more

ArentFox Schiff

US District Court to Examine Link Between PFAS and Cancer

ArentFox Schiff on

Amidst mounting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulation and litigation, the Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) judge overseeing the federal litigation related to firefighting foam has scheduled a “Science Day.”...more

Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.

Rhode Island’s First Asbestos Verdict in Nearly 40 Years

For the first time in nearly 40 years, an asbestos case was tried to verdict in Rhode Island. This case, The Estate of Bonnie Bonito, resulted in a full defense verdict!...more

Goldberg Segalla

Federal District Court Grants Pump Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment in Asbestos Action

Goldberg Segalla on

In this asbestos action, plaintiff Michele Salvemini alleges exposure to asbestos while working as a marine engineer and shipyard mechanical worker on various merchant and U.S. Navy ships from 1974 to 2007. During this...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Washington Court Finds No Take-Home Exposure in Asbestos Bench Trial

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In Perkins v. United States, Plaintiff Tristan Perkins sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for her mother Geraldine Perkins’ (“Decedent”) alleged wrongful death due to asbestos exposure. Alleging...more

Goldberg Segalla

Court Rules in Favor of Defendant in Asbestos Action for Lack of Causation

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: United States District Court for the Western District of Washington - Plaintiff claimed decedent Geraldine Rabb Perkins had asbestos exposure resulting in her diagnosis of mesothelioma. Plaintiff specifically...more

Goldberg Segalla

Caulking Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Causation Grounds Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County (NYCAL) - In this asbestos matter, decedent, Anna M. Buczynski, alleged exposure to asbestos from laundering the clothing of her former husband, Anthony Buczynski. From 1976...more

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiff’s Causation Expert Must Identify Subjects of Talc Causation Studies

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department - The Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department recently determined that a causation...more

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiffs’ Motion for New Trial Reversed on Appeal

Goldberg Segalla on

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit - In this action, the plaintiffs alleged decedent Vita Chenet had asbestos exposure from personal use of various talcum powder products, including Cashmere Bouquet, throughout her...more

Goldberg Segalla

Motion for Summary Judgment Denied as Defendant Failed to Prove Lack of Causation

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - Plaintiff John P. Reeves alleges asbestos exposure from, among other things, the asbestos-containing caulk of defendant DAP Inc. while serving in the U.S. Navy aboard...more

Goldberg Segalla

Talc Defendant Unsuccessful on Summary Judgment

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction:  Supreme Court of New York, New York County - Plaintiff Lita Goldstein was diagnosed in March 2022 with mesothelioma. She initiated a suit against several defendants in May 2022, including Kolmar Laboratories...more

McCarter & English, LLP

New York Appellate Ruling in Talc Case Has Implications on Choice of Law Inquiry in Toxic Tort Matters

The New York Appellate Division, First Department issued an important ruling on May 21, 2024, in In Re: New York City Asbestos Litigation, Patricia Rasso, as independent executor of The Estate of Linda English, deceased v....more

Goldberg Segalla

Appellate Court Reverses Premise Defendant’s Summary Judgment Ruling

Goldberg Segalla on

Court:  Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston - Carolyn and Frank Burford were married from November 1962 until Carolyn’s death in 2015. While married, Frank Buford worked for Alcoa at its aluminum smelter...more

Goldberg Segalla

Denial of Dryer Felt Manufacturer’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict Affirmed

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina - In this mesothelioma matter, the Supreme Court of South Carolina granted a writ of certiorari to review decisions of the South Carolina Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s...more

Goldberg Segalla

Texas Appellate Court Reverses Summary Judgment in Take-Home Exposure Case

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston - In this asbestos action, a Texas Appellate Court reversed and remanded the grant of a no-evidence summary judgment motion as to defendant Howmet Aerospace Inc.,...more

Goldberg Segalla

Motion for Summary Judgment of Valve Manufacturer Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Plaintiff-Decedent John Gonder alleged exposure to asbestos during his employment as a Con Edison inspector between the 1970s and 1990s. He died in May 2021 at 86 years old from lung cancer. Defendant Jenkins Bros. filed a...more

Goldberg Segalla

Talc Defendant Denied Summary Judgment in NYCAL

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In this talc action, plaintiff Christina Thomas alleged she was exposed to asbestos from products manufactured by defendant Port Jervis Laboratories Inc., s/h/a Kolmar...more

Goldberg Segalla

Tile Manufacturer Denied Summary Judgment in NYCAL

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In this asbestos action, plaintiff Peter Marino alleged he was exposed to asbestos from floor tiles manufactured by defendant, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Goodyear...more

Goldberg Segalla

Gasket Manufacturer’s Motions for Summary Judgment Granted, in part, Pursuant to Maritime Law

Goldberg Segalla on

Court - United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Plaintiff’s decedent, Joseph Pine, served as a fireman aboard the USS Constellation from 1965-1967. After he died from mesothelioma a month...more

Goldberg Segalla

Floor Tile Manufacturer’s Motion for Renewal Denied on Causation Ground

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - Defendant Mannington Mills Inc. moved for renewal of its previously denied motion for summary judgment, arguing the New York Court of Appeals’ Nemeth decision has since...more

Goldberg Segalla

Valve Manufacturer Denied Summary Judgment in NYCAL

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In this asbestos action, defendant Crosby moved for summary judgment on duty to warn and causation grounds. Plaintiff Joseph Deroy opposed the motion....more

Goldberg Segalla

Engine Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court of New York, New York County - Defendant Perkins Engines Inc. filed motions for summary judgment in two actions, Frederick and Nankervis. In Frederick, Perkins filed its motion based upon a lack of...more

Goldberg Segalla

Flooring Defendant Denied Renewal of Two Previous Summary Judgment Decisions

Goldberg Segalla on

Supreme Court of New York, New York County - In two asbestos actions (Avakian and Layton), defendant Mannington Mills moved to renew its summary judgment motion. Mannington contends that there was a subsequent change in the...more

Goldberg Segalla

NJ Appellate Court Reverses $223.8 J&J Talc Verdict on Causation Grounds

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division - Johnson & Johnson has successfully appealed a $223.8 judgment against it following a trial involving allegations of asbestos-contaminated talcum powder in...more

68 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide