News & Analysis as of

COFC › Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) › Appeals

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

“What’s In A Name?”: Federal Circuit Holds Claims Court Blurred Distinction Between ‘Size Protests’ And ‘Bid Protests’ In...

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

Many small businesses learn the hard way that a “bid protest” and a “size protest” differ in much more than name only. Whereas generally a “bid protest” challenges agency action taken in connection with a procurement and can...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government...

February 2021 Bid Protest Roundup (Law360 Spotlight)

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government... on

This installment of our monthly Law360 bid protest spotlight considers: (1) a company’s successful challenge to an agency’s decision to take corrective action and reopen a competition the company had already won; (2) a...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Federal Circuit Clarifies Bid Protest Stay Timeliness Rules

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit confirms that a protester seeking to avail itself of the statutory “automatic stay” of performance in connection with a GAO bid protest must file that protest within five days...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government...

Significant Government Contract Litigation: A Year in Review

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government... on

Last year provided a number of important claims and cases that further developed various aspects of litigation regarding the Contract Disputes Act (CDA). The major issues raised in some of the more notable claims include...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide