News & Analysis as of

Collateral Attack

Freeman Law

Bills of Review in Texas

Freeman Law on

What is a Bill of Review?  A bill of review is an equitable proceeding, seeking to set aside a prior judgment that is no longer subject to challenge by a motion for new trial or appeal...more

Freeman Law

What is a Collateral Attack?

Freeman Law on

Judgments can generally be attacked through either a direct or collateral attack.  A collateral attack, as opposed to a direct attack, does not attempt to secure a corrected judgment; rather, it involves an attempt to avoid...more

Carlton Fields

SDNY Declines to Adopt Collateral Attack Doctrine, Grants Motion to Compel Arbitration

Carlton Fields on

Petitioners Credit Suisse AG and Lara Warner sought to permanently stay an arbitration commenced by respondent Colleen Graham, who cross-moved to compel the arbitration. The petitioners claimed the proceeding was an...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides United States v. Palomar-Santiago

On May 24, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. Palomar-Santiago, No. 20-437, holding that each of the statutory requirements for bringing a collateral attack against a removal order under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)...more

Haug Partners LLP

Security People, Inc. v. Iancu, 2019-2118, 2020 WL 4873762 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 20, 2020)

Haug Partners LLP on

In an appeal from the Northern District of California, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Security People’s Administrative Procedure Act (APA) suit challenging the constitutionality of inter partes...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Cancellation of Patent Claims through Reexamination Insufficient to Mount Collateral Attack on Multimillion-Dollar Jury Verdict

Judge Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas has denied defendants’ motion to stay the post-trial phase of a patent infringement litigation pending ex parte reexamination where the request for reexamination was filed four...more

Smart & Biggar

Ontario Court of Appeal allows Sanofi and Schering to plead that Federal Court ramipril patent invalidity decision was flawed due...

Smart & Biggar on

In an action by Apotex for compensation from Sanofi and Schering under the Ontario Statute of Monopolies, U.K. Statute of Monopolies and the Trade-marks Act, the Ontario Court of Appeal has overturned a motion judge’s...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide