News & Analysis as of

Collateral Attack Administrative Remedies

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides United States v. Palomar-Santiago

On May 24, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. Palomar-Santiago, No. 20-437, holding that each of the statutory requirements for bringing a collateral attack against a removal order under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d)...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Cancellation of Patent Claims through Reexamination Insufficient to Mount Collateral Attack on Multimillion-Dollar Jury Verdict

Judge Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas has denied defendants’ motion to stay the post-trial phase of a patent infringement litigation pending ex parte reexamination where the request for reexamination was filed four...more

2 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide