News & Analysis as of

Contract Termination Franchise Agreements

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Salon Franchisee Snipped, Confirmed, and Enjoined

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Tennessee granted a motion for a default judgment in the franchisor’s favor against its former franchisee requiring the franchisee to pay damages and comply with the post-termination obligations...more

Lathrop GPM

New Jersey Appellate Court Confirms Terminated Retailer Is Not in a Franchise Relationship with Manufacturer

Lathrop GPM on

A New Jersey appellate court affirmed a state trial court’s ruling that a terminated retailer of custom outdoor kitchens was not in a franchise relationship with a manufacturer of outdoor grills and that the New Jersey...more

Lathrop GPM

New Jersey Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment Against Hotel Franchise Agreement Guarantor Enforcing Liquidated Damages...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in New Jersey recently granted summary judgment against the guarantor of a hotel franchise agreement, requiring him to pay contractual post-termination damages. Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Keys Hosp., LLC, 2024...more

Carlton Fields

SDNY Confirms Arbitration Order, Holding Order Was Final and Arbitrator Did Not Exceed Authority

Carlton Fields on

In Subway Franchise Systems of Canada ULC v. Subway Developments 2000 Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addressed whether an arbitrator exceeded her authority when ordering that one of the...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Muscling Through the Competition

Lewitt Hackman on

A Minnesota district court issued a preliminary injunction against a former franchisee who engaged in a competing business during the franchise relationship. Snap Fitness, Inc., a gym franchisor, entered into a franchise...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Kicking Injunctions to the Curb

Lewitt Hackman on

A Kansas district court denied a franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction against its former franchisee who engaged in competing businesses immediately after terminating the franchise relationship....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: All-Franchisor-Can-Eat

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in New Jersey recently found that restaurant franchisor Golden Corral was entitled to nearly $1.2 million in consequential damages after terminating a franchised Golden Corral restaurant....more

Lathrop GPM

Federal Circuit Reverses Preliminary Injunction on Franchisor’s Patent and Trade Dress Infringement Claim

Lathrop GPM on

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a preliminary injunction granted as to franchisor Urban Air’s patent and trade dress infringement claims against Kangaroo, LLC. UATP IP, LLC v. Kangaroo, LLC, 2024 WL 658205 (Fed....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Getting Away With Tax (Franchisor) Evasion

Lewitt Hackman on

A Pennsylvania federal court refused to enforce non-competition and non-solicitation covenants in a franchise agreement of a nationwide tax preparation service franchisor. The court dismissed the franchisor’s request for...more

Lathrop GPM

Virginia Federal Court Denies Franchisor’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Virginia denied a franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction against a former franchisee violating the franchise agreement’s post-termination noncompete. JTH Tax, LLC v. Younan, 2023 WL 6304865 (E.D....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Liquidated Damages, 30 Minutes or Less

Lewitt Hackman on

A Michigan district court held a franchisee breached its obligations under its franchise agreements and upheld the liquidated damages clause in the agreements....more

Lathrop GPM

North Carolina Federal Court Rules That Franchise Agreement’s 1-Year Statute of Limitations Clause Barred Action Against...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in North Carolina recently dismissed a complaint brought by Bigelow Corporation against its franchisor Hound Town USA because the claims were time barred. Bigelow Corporation v. Hounds Town USA, LLC, 2023 WL...more

Lathrop GPM

Michigan Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment Enforcing Franchise Agreement Termination and Awarding Liquidated Damages and...

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Michigan granted Little Caesar Pizza Enterprises, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment seeking to enforce its termination of the franchise agreements between it and franchisee S&S Pizza Enterprises, Inc....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Court Concludes that “Good Cause” for Termination Includes More than Items Listed in Statute

Fox Rothschild LLP on

On May 11, 2023, the federal district court in Rapid City, South Dakota, concluded that the South Dakota motor vehicle dealer law did not provide an exclusive list of “good cause” franchise terminations. Eddie’s Truck...more

Lathrop GPM

Minnesota Bankruptcy Court Enjoins Franchisee’s Breach of Post-Termination Noncompete

Lathrop GPM on

A Minnesota bankruptcy court granted Fantastic Sams summary judgment and enjoined a former franchisee from violating the post-termination noncompete in its franchise agreements after the franchisee rejected the agreements in...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Court Taxes Franchisor’s Restrictive Covenants

Lewitt Hackman on

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s order denying a franchisor’s request for preliminary injunction against a terminated franchisee to enforce covenants not to compete or solicit former clients....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Pizza Franchisor’s Release Overcooked

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court denied a pizza franchisor’s motion to dismiss a former franchisee’s complaint, finding the former franchisee sufficiently pleaded the franchisor coerced the franchisee into signing a general release....more

Lathrop GPM

Oklahoma Federal Court Grants Franchisor’s Post-Termination Motion for Preliminary Injunction Related to Trademark Infringement

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Oklahoma granted franchisor Pizza Inn, Inc.’s motion for preliminary injunction preventing two former Pizza Inn franchisees – Odetallah and Allen’s Dynamic Food – from operating competing pizza restaurants...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: Default! Default!

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Michigan granted franchisor Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (LCEI) a default judgment against its former franchisee for violating the terms of the franchise agreement....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Promises to Prospectives

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in New Jersey denied Travelodge Hotels’ motion for partial summary judgment against a former franchisee, holding there are genuine issues of fact as to Travelodge’s breach of contract claims....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: A Window into Dispute Resolution

Lewitt Hackman on

Claims by a window sales and installation franchisee against its franchisor were dismissed by a federal district court in Michigan because the franchisee did not comply with the prelitigation mediation procedure in the...more

Lathrop GPM

Connecticut Federal Court Denies Franchisee’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Following Termination

Lathrop GPM on

A federal court in Connecticut denied a franchisee’s motion for a temporary restraining order permitting it to operate until the court could hear a preliminary injunction motion. A.B. Corp. v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising, LLC,...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: No Repairing Delayed Filing

Lewitt Hackman on

A New Jersey federal court denied a franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction against a franchisee due to franchisor’s 11 month delay in bringing the motion. Franchisee entered into two franchise agreements with H-1 Auto...more

Stark & Stark

The How, When, and Why of Franchise Termination in New Jersey

Stark & Stark on

Terminating a franchise can pose several potential pitfalls and expose a franchisor to significant liability. A franchisor may not simply cancel, terminate, or refuse to renew a franchisee for just any reason....more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Breaking Up Is Hard to Do

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal district court in Nevada partly denied a franchisor’s summary judgment motion on claims brought by a franchisee. IJL Midwest entered into several franchise agreements with a franchisor of a dating and...more

51 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide