News & Analysis as of

Cost-Sharing Administrative Procedure Act

Groom Law Group, Chartered

Latest Update to the Ongoing Challenge to the ACA’s Preventive Services Mandate

On June 21, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (“Fifth Circuit”) issued its ruling in Braidwood v. Becerra. The court determined that the Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA”) requirement that group...more

Alston & Bird

Altera Redux – The Ninth Circuit Once Again Holds in Favor of the IRS

Alston & Bird on

The Ninth Circuit has repeated itself in reversing a unanimous Tax Court holding on the validity of the Treasury’s regulations under Section 482. Our International Tax Group examines the reconstituted panel’s significant...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Altera v. Commissioner: Rule of Law or Rule by Fiat?

On August 7, 2018, the Ninth Circuit panel vacated its earlier opinion in Altera v. Commissioner that, in a nutshell, had concluded that Treasury had complied with the Administrative Procedure Act (the “APA”) in issuing final...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Ninth Circuit Withdraws Controversial Altera Opinion And Will Allow New Judge To Make Ultimate Determination

On August 7, 2018, the Ninth Circuit withdrew its July 24 decision in Altera so that new panel member, Judge Susan P. Graber, can now consider the case....more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Share and share alike - the Ninth Circuit upholds regulations on stock-based compensation costs in cost-sharing arrangements

On July 24, 2018, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Altera Corporation v. Commissioner overturned a unanimous decision by the Tax Court invalidating Treas. Reg. § 1.482-7A(d)(2), which provides that a...more

Carlton Fields

Cost-Sharing Regulations Revived By Ninth Circuit

Carlton Fields on

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Tax Court in Altera Corp. in the latest chapter of the dispute over the validity of cost-sharing regulations. The decision, issued on July 24, revives certain regulatory...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Ninth Circuit Overturns Altera and Revives Regulations on Cost Sharing of Stock-Based Compensation

On July 24, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in a 2-to-1 opinion, ruled in Altera Corp. v. Commissioner that Treasury Regulations involving transfer pricing promulgated in 2003 (the Regulations) complied...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Focus on Tax Strategies & Developments - October 2015

McDermott Will & Emery on

Regulatory Developments Under § 367 Affecting Transfers of Appreciated Property to Foreign Corporations - Introduction: On September 14, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) and the Internal Revenue...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

No (Tax) Man Is Above the Law: The Tax Court Rejects Final Cost-Sharing Regulations in Altera Corporation and Subsidiaries v....

Our 26th President Theodore Roosevelt famously contributed to the American canon the following: “No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man’s permission when we ask him to obey it.” The notion that...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Altera: Tax Court Invalidates Section 482 Regulation on Administrative Law Grounds

McDermott Will & Emery on

In Altera, the U.S. Tax Court invalidated regulations under Section 482 requiring participants in qualified cost-sharing agreements to include stock-based compensation costs in the cost pool to comply with the arm’s-length...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Tax Court: Stock based Compensation Costs Need not be Included in International Cost-Sharing Arrangements

The Stunning Altera Case - Employee stock options are an important part of compensation—both as income to the executives and as a deduction for the employer. But when stock options are used by multinational companies,...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

"Tax Court Invalidates Stock-Based Compensation Amendment in Altera"

On July 27, 2015, the U.S. Tax Court, in Altera Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. No. 3, invalidated a 2003 amendment to Treas. Reg. §1.482-7(d)(2) (2003 Amendment) that required controlled participants in a...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide