News & Analysis as of

Dell Patents

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: June 2024

Fish & Richardson on

Universal Connectivity Tech. Inc. v. Dell Tech. Inc., 1-23-cv-01506 (W.D. Tex.), Dkt. No. 34, Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower to Judge Pitman - A magistrate judge recommended denying...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Data Scape Launches Patent Ligation Campaign in United States and Europe against Leading Technology Companies on Cloud-based Data...

Data Scape Limited, a non-practicing entity based in Ireland, has recently filed a wave of patent infringement lawsuits in the United States and Germany against leading technology companies including...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

No Second Chance on Remand for Late Arguments

Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC (“Dell II”), No. 2017-1101 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2018) - On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision affirming the Board’s refusal to consider new arguments that had been made...more

Knobbe Martens

Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Moore, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A party in an inter partes review proceeding may not present new evidence or arguments at oral...more

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP

Federal Circuit Reverses the PTAB’s Reliance on Evidence Presented Solely During Oral Argument and Its Claim Construction

On March 15, 2016, the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded the PTAB's cancellation of claims 3 and 20 of Patent No. 6,948,021 directed to hot-swappable components in computer systems. See Dell Inc., v. Acceleron, LLC, No....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Backup Anticipation with Obviousness - Dell Inc. v. Elecs. & Telecomms. Research Inst.

Addressing the issue of estoppel and joinder, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied a petitioner’s challenge, finding the petitioner was estopped from requesting the additional...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

The PTAB Explores Estoppel in New Representative Decision

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently announced the addition of its March 26, 2015 decision in Dell, Inc. et al. v. Electronics and Telecomms. Res. Inst., IPR2015-00549 (“the ‘549 IPR”) to its online list of...more

Knobbe Martens

PTAB Estops Follow-On Petition for Inter Partes Review Based New Combinations of Prior Art Raised in Earlier Petition

Knobbe Martens on

Dell, Inc. v. Electronics & Telecommunications Research Institute, IPR2015-00549, Paper 10 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 26, 2015) - The Board recently added a decision denying inter partes review in Dell, Inc. v. Electronics &...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Use Belt and Suspenders; Backup Anticipation with Obviousness - Dell Inc. v. Elecs. & Telecomms. Research Inst.

Addressing the issue of anticipation in the context of an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) rejected a petitioner’s anticipation challenge,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Tangible Claim Elements Failed to Save Abstract Business-Method Patent - Dell Inc. v. Disposition Servs. LLC

Further clarifying its views on subject-matter eligibility, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that a patent describing the disposal of obsolete assets—for example,...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

IP Newsflash - January 2015 #2

DISTRICT COURT CASES - District Court Opinion Underscores Importance of Careful Drafting of Settlement Agreements - A recent opinion penned by Chief Judge James C. Dever of the Eastern District of North Carolina...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide