News & Analysis as of

Discovery Restrictive Covenants

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Preparing for Trade Secret and Restrictive Covenant Litigation While the Court Near You is Closed

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Imagine this scenario: You are the general counsel of a company in a particularly competitive industry. A key company employee who has access to some of the company’s most sensitive information has been working remotely for...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Court Quashes Subpoena ‘Stunning in its Over Breadth’

In Lewis PR v. Murphy, Judge Kaplan quashed the plaintiff’s subpoena requesting 20 months of the defendant’s cell phone records. Judge Kaplan found that the subpoena was abusive and “stunning in its over breadth.” The...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Exploring the Pre-Discovery Trade Secret Identification Requirement in Massachusetts and Across the Country

Holland & Knight LLP on

Massachusetts recently adopted a version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) that became effective on Oct. 1, 2018. While similar to the UTSA in nearly every respect, the Commonwealth's new trade secret act additionally...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Perspectives From the Bench: A Recap of the AIPLA Trade Secret Law Summit’s Judicial Panel

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Several members of Seyfarth’s Trade Secrets, Computer Fraud & Non-Competes Practice Group attended the AIPLA’s annual Trade Secret Law Summit on November 12-13, 2015. Rick Lutkus spoke on a panel that was moderated by Erik...more

Snell & Wilmer

Five Questions to Consider Before Seeking to Restrain a Former Employee from Engaging in Competitive Activity

Snell & Wilmer on

Determining whether to enforce a restrictive covenant or confidentiality agreement against a former employee requires the careful consideration of legal, economic and practical considerations. Here are five questions an...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Contempt Charge Vacated Based On Valid Assertion of Attorney Client Privilege - Waste Management of Washington, Inc. v. Kattler et...

McDermott Will & Emery on

Finding that a district court had not provided procedural due process to an attorney for a sanctioned party, and that the district court abused its discretion in imposing sanctions for civil contempt against the attorney, the...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide