News & Analysis as of

Dispute Resolution Rulemaking Process

DLA Piper

American Arbitration Association Opens Comment Period for Draft Amendments to the Consumer Arbitration Rules

DLA Piper on

In early February, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) announced proposed changes to its Consumer Arbitration Rules. As part of those changes, AAA is seeking comments on the proposed revisions, with the comment period...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

CFPB denies consumers’ petition for rule prohibiting pre-dispute arbitration clauses

Ballard Spahr LLP on

We are very pleased to report that the CFPB has denied a Petition for Rulemaking filed by a group of consumer advocate organizations that would prohibit the use of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in consumer contracts in...more

King & Spalding

Congressmembers Send Letter to Departments Raising Provider Concerns with No Surprises Act Implementation

King & Spalding on

On March 18, 2024, thirty-nine (39) members of the United States House of Representatives sent a letter urging federal agencies to finalizing rulemaking regarding the implementation of the No Surprises Act. The letter,...more

ArentFox Schiff

No More Surprise Medical Bills: Biden Administration Issues New Surprise Billing Rulemaking Proposing Batching and Procedural...

ArentFox Schiff on

*This is the 12th article in a series analyzing the No Surprises Act and its implementation. To view the entire series, click here. A link to the proposed rule is here.  As background, Congress passed the Act to prevent...more

King & Spalding

Agencies Issue Informal No Surprises Act IDR Guidance on Batching and Air Ambulance Disputes

King & Spalding on

On November 28, 2023, the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury (the Departments) issued two sets of FAQs on aspects of the No Surprises Act (NSA) Independent Dispute Resolution Process (IDR...more

McDermott+

Departments Propose Broader Batching and IDR Process Changes for Surprise Billing Claims

McDermott+ on

On October 27, 2023, the US Departments of Health and Humans Services, Labor and the Treasury (the Departments), along with the Office of Personnel Management, issued a proposed rule titled Independent Dispute Resolution...more

McDermott Will & Emery

HHS, DOL and Treasury Issue a Proposed Rule Increasing Federal IDR Fees

McDermott Will & Emery on

On September 20, 2023, the US Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Labor (DOL) and the Treasury (collectively, the departments) issued a proposed rule related to the No Surprises Act’s (NSA’s) federal independent...more

ArentFox Schiff

No More Surprise Medical Bills: Providers Score Yet Another Victory as Texas Court Again Vacates Provisions of Biden...

ArentFox Schiff on

On August 24, 2023, health care providers in Texas scored yet another victory when a federal court vacated additional portions of the Biden Administration’s rulemaking under the federal No Surprises Act (the Act). This marked...more

King & Spalding

Provider Victory in Latest No Surprises Act Litigation Overturns QPA Rules

King & Spalding on

On August 24, 2023, Judge Kernodle of the Eastern District of Texas issued a fourth judgment overturning additional aspects of the No Surprises Act (NSA) rulemaking and guidance. This latest decision vacated aspects of...more

McDermott+

Implementation of the No Surprises Act Is Full of Surprises: What We Do and Don’t Know

McDermott+ on

It’s likely no surprise to anyone who has been following the implementation of the No Surprises Act over the last couple of years that we again find ourselves on an uncertain path. While Regs & Eggs has focused on some of the...more

ArentFox Schiff

No More Surprise Medical Bills: In Another Victory for Providers, Texas Court Vacates Administrative Fee and Batching Provisions...

ArentFox Schiff on

On August 3, 2023, health care providers in Texas scored yet another victory when a federal court vacated additional portions of the Biden Administration’s rules governing fee collection and claim batching under the federal...more

King & Spalding

Federal Court Vacates 600% Fee Hike to No Surprises Act IDR Fees

King & Spalding on

On August 3, 2023, the Texas Medical Association (TMA) was granted summary judgment in its challenge to (1) the $350 CY 2023 administrative fee for the No Surprises Act’s Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process and (2) a...more

Foley Hoag LLP

HRSA ADR Panel Dismisses NACHC's 340B Complaint Against Two Drug Manufacturers

Foley Hoag LLP on

The 340B program requires drug manufacturers to offer outpatient pharmaceuticals to statutorily defined covered entities (including certain hospitals and certain federal grantees, such as federally qualified health centers)...more

Holland & Knight LLP

HHS Releases Second Interim Final Rule Implementing No Surprises Act

Holland & Knight LLP on

The U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Labor (DOL), Treasury and Office of Personnel Management on Sept. 30, 2021, jointly released a second interim final rule (IFR) with comment period implementing...more

McGuireWoods LLP

CFPB’s Corday Reiterates Intent to Pursue Rulemaking on Consumer Arbitration Clauses, Despite Opposition

McGuireWoods LLP on

In testimony before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs on July 15, CFPB Director Richard Cordray affirmed the Bureau’s intention to proceed with rulemaking governing arbitration clauses in consumer...more

Foley Hoag LLP

DC District Court Strikes Down 340B Orphan Drug Rule

Foley Hoag LLP on

On May 23, Judge Contreras of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (DC District Court) ruled that the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) did not have the statutory authority to promulgate its...more

16 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide