News & Analysis as of

Doctrine of Equivalents Patents Summary Judgment

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Scope of Issued Patents May be Limited by Prosecution Estoppel Created in Child Cases

Cell therapy products in the U.S. are estimated to be worth approximately $4.5 billion currently and expected to grow to over $30 billion in the next ten years. As market value increases litigation is bound to heat up....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Andrews Adopts Magistrate Judge’s Report And Recommendation In Part In Granting Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment Of...

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in M2M Solutions LLC et al. v. Sierra Wireless America, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 14-1102-RGA (D.Del. March 31, 2021), the Court granted Defendants’ motion for...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Doctrine of Equivalents Analysis Should Not Be Simple Binary Comparison

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded a district court’s claim construction and grant of a defendant’s summary judgment motion of non-infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, finding that a...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Throws Out Diaper Genie Decision

Knobbe Martens on

EDGEWELL PERS. CARE BRANDS, LLC v. MUNCHKIN, INC. Before Newman, Moore, and Hughes. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Summary: Apparatus claims’ non-functional terms should be...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

EMED Technologies Corp. v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

In April, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granting summary judgment in favor of Repro-Med Systems, Inc., finding that Repro-Med did not infringe U.S. Patent...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Doctrine of Equivalents: Prosecution History Estoppel Can Be Both Amendment and Argument-Based

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a case involving at-home glucose monitoring systems, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found the patent owner was estopped from asserting a doctrine of equivalents theory of infringement based on subject...more

Dechert LLP

Federal Circuit Panel Describes the Doctrine of Equivalents as Applying “Only in Exceptional Cases”

Dechert LLP on

In a patent owner’s declaratory judgment action under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) a Federal Circuit panel in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1551 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2019) narrowly...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - May 2019 #2

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Appeal No. 2018-1551 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2019) - In an appeal from a district court’s summary judgment of non-infringement, the Federal Circuit affirmed claim...more

McDermott Will & Emery

No Parking: Source of Anticipating Disclosure Determines If It’s “of Another”

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a combined opinion, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed appeals from district court grants of summary judgment over two patents, and an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that one of...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - February 2019

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Duncan Parking Techs., Inc. v. IPS Group, Inc. and IPS Group, Inc. v. Duncan Solutions, Inc. et al., Appeal Nos. 2018-1205, -1360 (Fed. Cir. January 31, 2019) - The Court this week provided a...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Fresh From the Bench: Latest Federal Circuit Court Cases

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Ottah v. Fiat Chrysler, Appeal No. 2017-1842 (March 7, 2018) - In Ottah v. Fiat Chrysler, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement as to...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

2017 and Early 2018 Supreme Court and Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit

Arbitration - Waymo v. Uber Technologies, 870 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2017) - Waymo sued Uber and others for trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement. Uber contends that Waymo should be compelled to...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

2017 Supreme Court and Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit, With Some Significant Cases from 2016

Arbitration - Waymo v. Uber Technologies, 870 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2017) - Waymo sued Uber and others for trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement. Uber contends that Waymo should be compelled to...more

Knobbe Martens

Doctrine of Equivalents under Enzo Biochem Inc. v. Applera Corp.

Knobbe Martens on

Before Prost, O’Malley, and Wallach. Appeal from the District of Connecticut (nonprecedential). On August 2, 2017, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut granting...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Summary Judgment Denied on Reverse Doctrine of Equivalents Defense

On April 28, 2017, the District Court for the District of Delaware denied AVM Technologies’ motion for summary judgment because Intel’s non infringement defense based on the reverse doctrine of equivalents requires the Court...more

Proskauer - New England IP Blog

Summary Judgment Shot Down in Rifle Patent Lawsuit

In a recent patent case concerning hunting rifles, Judge McCafferty in the District of New Hampshire granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to literal infringement of a patent on a rifle handguard,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Look to Specification to Interpret Facially Unclear Claims

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing claim construction issues, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reiterated the necessity of reading claims in the context of the written description when they are not clear on their face. Howmedica...more

Morris James LLP

Magistrate’s Recommendations On Validity And Noninfringement Are Adopted

Morris James LLP on

Impulse Technology Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., C.A. No 11-586 – RGA, September 22, 2015. Andrews, J. Magistrate’s Reports and Recommendations regarding denial of summary judgment of invalidity is adopted and...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Empowering Customers to Sell an Exonerated Accused Product - Speedtrack Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.

In a decision that expands a customer’s right to defend itself under the Kessler doctrine, the Federal Circuit clarified that a customer is not subject to liability for a product that has already been cleared of patent...more

McDermott Will & Emery

No Foreseeability Bar to The Application of the Doctrine of Equivalents - Ring & Pinion Service, Inc. v. ARB Corp. LTD.

Addressing the doctrine of equivalents infringement of a means-plus-function limitation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a grant of summary judgment of non-infringement based on an...more

BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler Patent Watch: Cheese Sys., Inc. v. Tetra Pak Cheese and Powder Sys., Inc.

BakerHostetler on

Where a court holds a claim obvious without making findings of secondary considerations, the lack of specific consideration of secondary considerations ordinarily requires a remand....more

BakerHostetler

Patent Watch: Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc.

BakerHostetler on

On February 20, 2013, in Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Dyk, Moore,* Reyna) reversed and remanded the district court's summary judgment that Brilliant did...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide