News & Analysis as of

Eminent Domain Cal Code of Civil Procedure

Downey Brand LLP

Privately Owned Public Utility Not Required to Comply With CEQA in Eminent Domain Action

Downey Brand LLP on

In Robinson v. Superior Court (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 1144, the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that Southern California Edison (SCE), as an investor-owned public utility, was not required to comply with CEQA in an eminent...more

Perkins Coie

Condemnee Need Not Entirely Vacate Premises to Recover Damages After Condemnation is Abandoned

Perkins Coie on

Complete physical dispossession of a property is not a prerequisite to an award of damages after a condemnation proceeding is abandoned—moving from the property in reliance on the order granting the agency possession is...more

Perkins Coie

Condemned Property Not Used Within Ten Years Must Be Offered for Sale to Original Owner

Perkins Coie on

The City of Los Angeles was required to offer to sell condemned property back to its original owner because the property had not been used and the City Council did not adopt a resolution reauthorizing the public use until 19...more

Nossaman LLP

Court Reminds Public Agency it Must Put Condemned Property to Public Use Within 10 Years

Nossaman LLP on

After adopting a resolution of necessity and initiating eminent domain proceedings to acquire private property, public agencies are usually in a rush to move forward with the proposed public project. But every once in a...more

Nossaman LLP

California Supreme Court Determines That Legal Issues Motions Cannot Be Made in Inverse Condemnation Actions

Nossaman LLP on

It is Christmas in July for eminent domain practitioners! We have a California Supreme Court opinion on a condemnation case, which is rare. The case, Weiss v. People ex rel. Department of Transportation (2020 Cal. LEXIS...more

Patton Sullivan Brodehl LLP

California Court Clarifies Recovery of Goodwill in Eminent Domain Cases

Goodwill is one of the trickier areas of eminent domain law. When a governmental agency takes private property through the exercise of eminent domain powers, the agency generally must pay the property owner the fair market...more

Nossaman LLP

Fundamental Evidentiary Issues – Avoiding Exclusion of Your Opinion of Value and Comparable Sales

Nossaman LLP on

In an unpublished opinion filed this week, the California Court of Appeal confirmed two fundamental evidentiary rules related to eminent domain matters: Before we delve into the case, here’s a basic reminder of California law...more

Nossaman LLP

Court Clarifies Rules for Recovery of Attorneys' Fees in Eminent Domain Actions

Nossaman LLP on

In California eminent domain actions, the parties are required to exchange formal settlement proposals 20 days before trial. If the case proceeds to trial, the property owner may recover litigation expenses if its demand was...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide