News & Analysis as of

Estoppel Vacatur

McDermott Will & Emery

Since Vacatur Seeks Equitable Relief, Clean Hands Matter

McDermott Will & Emery on

In an opinion related to its 2021 ruling that a decision in earlier inter partes reexaminations of related patents had a preclusive effect that collaterally estopped the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (Board) from making new...more

McDermott Will & Emery

What Preclusion? Post-IPR Reexam Moves Forward

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived a petitioner’s validity challenge seeking ex parte review at the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO), reversing a district court decision dismissing its complaint seeking...more

Knobbe Martens

PTO Director’s Estoppel Decision Ending Reexam Is Subject to Judicial Review

Knobbe Martens on

ALARM.COM INC. v. HIRSHFELD - Before Taranto, Chen, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Summary: The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) permits judicial...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Updates - October 2016

WilmerHale on

Medtronic, Inc. v. Robert Bosch Healthcare (No. 2015-1977, -1986, -1987, 10/20/16) (Lourie, Dyk, Hughes) - Dyk, J. Denying petition for rehearing and confirming the Court's earlier order. “The Board's vacatur of its...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide