News & Analysis as of

Excessive Fines Clause Eighth Amendment

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

A Constitutional Perspective on False Claims Act Penalties: District Court Finds That Penalties Conflict With Constitution’s...

In a potential watershed decision issued on February 26, 2025, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled, in U.S. ex rel. Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas, that the civil penalties...more

Jones Day

Federal Court Rejects False Claims Act's Draconian Penalties

Jones Day on

Following a jury's verdict, a federal court slashed civil penalties under the False Claims Act ("FCA") as violative of the Constitution's 8th Amendment....more

Freeman Law

Willful FBAR Penalties and the Excessive Fines Clause: District Court Says Context is Key

Freeman Law on

In its recent decision in United States v. Leeds, the United States District Court for the District of Idaho upheld the application of willful penalties against a deceased husband for failing to report certain foreign bank...more

Freeman Law

Eleventh Circuit Holds Willful FBAR Penalties Unconstitutional

Freeman Law on

In United States v. Schwarzbaum, the Eleventh Circuit recently held that certain penalties for failure to file FBARs violated the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. The district court in this case had agreed...more

Miller Canfield

The FBAR penalty [is] [is not] a fine. Choose one.

Miller Canfield on

Conflicting Decisions: In August, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held in United States v. Schwarzbaum that a monetary civil penalty imposed for willfully failing to file a foreign bank account report...more

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

Recent Trio of Eighth Amendment Challenges to FCA Judgments Includes Two Successes; Lack of Uniformity Across Courts Remains

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP on

So far this year, three False Claims Act defendants have challenged judgments against them based on the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Remarkably, two were successful, as the District of Minnesota more than...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

FBAR: The Eleventh Circuit Holds That Willful FBAR Penalties are Subject to the Eighth Amendment Creating Circuit Split

Fox Rothschild LLP on

For years, FBAR litigants have made the commonsense argument that large willful FBAR penalties, which can exceed the value of the unreported foreign accounts themselves, violate the excessive fines clause of the Eighth...more

Jones Day

Eighth Circuit Holds Penalties in Non-Intervened FCA Case Violate Excessive Fines Clause

Jones Day on

The Situation: The False Claims Act ("FCA") imposes treble damages on defendants, as well as mandatory penalties per false claim. Because alleged false claims often involve much smaller amounts—for example, in cases with a...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

There Are Limits! Reining In FCA Penalties Pursuant to the Excessive Fines Clause

In the high-stakes realm of False Claims Act (FCA) litigation per-claim penalties can reach daunting levels that dwarf even treble damages. A recent ruling from the Eighth Circuit Court provides valuable guidance on the...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

District Court Finds that $487 Million False Claims Act Judgment Violates Eighth Amendment

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

On February 8, the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled that a $487 million False Claims Act (FCA) damages award entered last year against Precision Lens and its co-founder violated the Eighth Amendment’s...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads

SCOTUS Finds that Minnesota Tax Lien Statute Violates the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause

In Tyler v. Hennepin County, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the State of Minnesota violated a property owner's constitutional rights by keeping the excess proceeds from a tax lien sale. Geraldine Tyler owned a...more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Supreme Court Holds Forfeiture of Tax Sale Surplus Proceeds is a Governmental Taking

“The taxpayer must render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, but no more.” Tyler v. Hennepin County, No. 22-166, Slip Op. at 14 (May 25, 2023) - Less than a month after oral argument, the United States Supreme Court ruled...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

The Trebling Effect of (Some) False Claims Act Trials

There are multiple components to the risk defendants must consider when faced with going to trial for a matter involving the False Claims Act (FCA). Setting aside the incalculable impact that litigation can have on business...more

Irwin IP LLP

RICO Requires Transfer of Title to Forfeit Trademarks: USA v. Mongol Nation, No. 19-50176 and 19-50190 (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2023)

Irwin IP LLP on

The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the denial of the United States’ second motion for preliminary order of forfeiture of the Mongol Nation’s trademarks.  The Ninth Circuit held that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

DOJ-Initiated False Claims Act Activity on the Rise

Key Points The volume of new False Claims Act (FCA) case filings remained high in 2021, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) collected more than $5.6 billion in settlements and judgments — the second-largest annual total in...more

Jones Day

Eleventh Circuit Holds Excessive Fines Clause Applies to Penalties in Non-Intervened FCA Cases

Jones Day on

A defendant who violates the FCA can be liable for treble damages plus a civil penalty of $5,500 to $11,000 (adjusted for inflation) for each false claim. Meanwhile, FCA lawsuits often involve tens of thousands of alleged...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Is There a Constitutional Limit to Excessive Fines in False Claims Act Cases? Eleventh Circuit Says a Million Dollar Fine for a...

In late December, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in Yates v. Pinellas Hematology & Oncology, P.A. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s imposition of damages and...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Former Theranos CEO Convicted of Defrauding Investors

ArentFox Schiff on

Former Theranos CEO Convicted of Defrauding Investors - Elizabeth Holmes, founder and former CEO of blood testing start-up Theranos, was found guilty of one count of conspiracy and three counts of wire fraud for her...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

One to Watch: Constitutional Challenges to NYC’s Price Gouging Rule

On March 18, 2021, retailer Union Square Supply, Inc. filed a civil rights class action lawsuit in the Southern District of New York challenging New York City’s price gouging enforcement practices. The complaint alleges that...more

Lowndes

Tax Court Strikes a Blow to Medical Marijuana Industry, Although Dissents Offer Some Hope

Lowndes on

As more and more states are allowing legal use of marijuana, medical marijuana businesses are faced with large tax bills because of marijuana’s continued classification as a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law. ...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

Case to Watch: U.S. Supreme Court Decision Provides Florida Homeowner Grounds to Challenge Excessive Fees for Code Violations

Cities and towns have become increasingly aggressive in their efforts to avoid blight resulting from vacant and foreclosed properties and enforce the state and local sanitary codes. At what point does a valid code violation...more

Blank Rome LLP

Timbs v. Indiana: A Modest Victory and a Missed Opportunity

Blank Rome LLP on

On February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision on the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause. In Timbs v. Indiana, 2019 DJDAR 1337, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg authored a unanimous decision holding that...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Limits States’ Civil Forfeiture Powers

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a ruling that significantly curbs the power of state and local law enforcement authorities to seek forfeiture of assets connected to criminal activity, the U.S. Supreme Court recently held that the Eighth Amendment’s...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS ruling that Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines prohibition applies to states could provide new weapon to consumer financial...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Earlier this week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Timbs v. Indiana that the prohibition on excessive fines in the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is incorporated against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. ...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS ruling on application of Eighth Amendment excessive fines prohibition to states could have implications for consumer...

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Timbs v. Indiana, which presents the issue of whether the prohibition on excessive fines in the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is incorporated...more

36 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide