News & Analysis as of

Federal Rules of Evidence Expert Testimony Motion to Exclude

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Defense Expert’s Hearsay Statements Granted

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; July 18, 2022 - Plaintiffs filed an asbestos-related lawsuit on behalf of Decedent, Callan Cortez, alleging that Mr. Cortez contracted mesothelioma as a...more

White and Williams LLP

Idaho District Court Affirms Its Role as the Gatekeeper of Expert Testimony

White and Williams LLP on

Many subrogation claims involving fire losses rely heavily on expert testimony. Expert testimony is admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 if it is both relevant and reliable. In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Exclusion of Evidence at the PTAB - Does it ever happen?

Experienced PTAB practitioners know that the Board rarely grants motions to exclude evidence in Post Grant proceedings. In this article, we look beyond the grim anecdotes and provide some statistics, as well as the Board’s...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide