News & Analysis as of

Franchise Investment Acts Franchisee

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisor 101: Poked in the Eye

Lewitt Hackman on

A poke restaurant franchisee in Ohio sued the franchisor for violation of the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL) and other claims. The franchisor defendants moved to dismiss the claims. A California federal court...more

Lewitt Hackman

Franchisee 101: The (Ice Cream) Cart Before the Rescission

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Cleveland rejected a California franchisee’s claim that an Ohio-based ice cream franchisor violated the California Franchise Investment Law (CFIL). The claim failed because the franchisee could not show it...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Is It a Franchise? Yes and No

Lewitt Hackman on

A federal court in Indiana made an interesting decision on whether a business relationship was a franchise. Wabash National Corp. is a famous maker of semitrailers. Wabash notified a dealer in Texas that its dealership was...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide