News & Analysis as of

Franchise Tax Board Gillette v Franchise Tax Board

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

California Supreme Court Holds Multistate Tax Compact is Not Binding

On December 31, 2015, the California Supreme Court closed the book on California’s Multistate Tax Compact election saga, unanimously holding that the Compact is not a binding contract among its members and the State was not...more

Morgan Lewis

California Tax Refund Opportunity Based on Gillette

Morgan Lewis on

Taxpayers should review their apportionment methodology for prior taxable years to determine whether they should file refund claims based on the Multistate Tax Compact's evenly weighted three-factor apportionment formula....more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

A Close Shave: California Court of Appeal Rules on Multistate Compact Election

On October 2, 2012, the California Court of Appeal issued an opinion on rehearing in The Gillette Company et al. v. Franchise Tax Board, reversing in full the trial court’s decision in favor of the Franchise Tax Board (FTB)....more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Gillette Ruling Could Impact Alabama and Other MTC Member States

On July 24, 2012, the California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court decision and granted the taxpayers’ requested refund claims that utilized an equally weighted three-factor apportionment formula. This despite the fact...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Gillette wins California Multistate Compact Case in Court of Appeal

In 1966, the California Legislature adopted the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (“UDITPA”), a model law which had been promulgated in 1957 by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Law....more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide