News & Analysis as of

Honeycutt v. United States Methamphetamine

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Supreme Court Limitation on Forfeiture Will Impact Health Care Fraud Prosecutions

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Health care fraud prosecutions in the Second Circuit and throughout the country have typically sought forfeiture money judgments against all defendants for the proceeds of the fraud obtained by all members of a health care...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

A Criminal Defendant Cannot Forfeit Property He Never Received

Ballard Spahr LLP on

On June 5th, the United States Supreme Court held in Honeycutt v. United States that a criminal defendant is not jointly and severally liable for property his co-conspirator derived from the crime, and that he only can be...more

Cooley LLP

Alert: Supreme Court Reins in Criminal Asset Forfeiture Actions

Cooley LLP on

On Monday, June 5, 2017, the US Supreme Court significantly curtailed the government's power to seize assets from co-conspirators in a criminal enterprise. In Honeycutt v. United States, — S.Ct. — (2017), the Supreme Court...more

Carlton Fields

Honeycutt v. United States: Mandated Criminal Asset Forfeiture Receives Clear Limitation — Joint and Several Forfeiture Liability...

Carlton Fields on

Introduction - On June 5, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Honeycutt v. United States, No. 16-142, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), narrowing the scope of federal criminal asset forfeiture for drug...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide