News & Analysis as of

Indefiniteness Extrinsic Evidence

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (January 17 – January 20): “Larger Than” Or “Large Enough”?

If you think claim construction is more fun than watching paint peel, then you’re probably a patent lawyer. And what’s more fun than claim construction? Claim construction with an indefiniteness challenge, as happened in this...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Dictionaries Don’t Know Best: The Intrinsic Record Prevails (Again)

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed the tension between the intrinsic and extrinsic record in claim construction, holding that the intrinsic record should be relied on first. The Court therefore reversed...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Terms of Degree Not Always Indefinite

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned a district court determination that the claim terms “resilient” and “pliable” were indefinite. The Federal Circuit found that the claims, while broad, were...more

Snell & Wilmer

Federal Circuit Rejects “Unanswered Questions” Indefiniteness Standard

Snell & Wilmer on

Last week, a split Federal Circuit panel reversed a decision invalidating certain computer-aided-design patent claims because the district court used an incorrect indefiniteness standard....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Stick to the Fax: Conflicting Statements Made During Prosecution Lead to Indefiniteness

McDermott Will & Emery on

In deciding whether use of the term “passive link” to define a connection between a computer terminal and a fax machine rendered a patent claim indefinite, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Federal Circuit Confirms That “Magnetic Fuzz” Is Too Fuzzy for a Patent Claim

Fenwick & West LLP on

On September 15, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in IQASR v. Wendt, found that a district court did not err in its scrutiny of the extrinsic and intrinsic evidence presented to find U.S. Patent No....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

IBSA Institut Biochimique, S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

The Federal Circuit has spent the past few years applying the Supreme Court's most recent precedent, Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., on the indefiniteness standards in the patent statute.  35 U.S.C. § 112(b).  The...more

Knobbe Martens

Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. v. ITC

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summary - Before Prost, Bryson, and O’Malley. Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”). Summary: Evidence intrinsic to a patent may be sufficient to overcome the presumption...more

Dickinson Wright

Intellectual Property Legal News: Volume 2, Number 1

Dickinson Wright on

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS: IS IT TIME TO RETHINK HOW YOU WILL ARGUE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION? The United States Supreme Court decided in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. that the Federal Circuit must review all...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide