News & Analysis as of

Internal Affairs Doctrine State of Incorporation

Allen Matkins

Court Rules Internal Affairs Doctrine Bars California Insider Trading Claim

Allen Matkins on

California, unlike the federal government, has codified its prohibition on insider trading. Corporations Code Section 25402 provides...more

Allen Matkins

Court: Internal Affairs Yields To Choice Of Law

Allen Matkins on

"Whereof what's past is prologue, what to come" Youngevity Int'l v. Smith, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31526 involved cross motions to dismiss a claim for breach of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, argued...more

Proskauer - The Capital Commitment

Veil-Piercing Under California Law – Heightened Risks for Fund Managers

We recently posted about the risks associated with veil-piercing claims and the ways in which fund managers can protect themselves from exposure to these claims. Our first post on veil-piercing focused on Delaware standards,...more

Allen Matkins

Officers And The Internal Affairs Doctrine

Allen Matkins on

My guess is that most attorneys would say that the duty of an officer to the corporation are governed by the law of the state of incorporation under the “internal affairs doctrine”.  As explained by the U.S. Supreme Court,...more

Snell & Wilmer

Impact of Delaware Fee-Shifting Provisions on Derivative Actions in California

Snell & Wilmer on

A recent decision in the Delaware Supreme Court, in conjunction with the broad California exceptions to the internal affairs doctrine, may dictate the legal landscape of shareholder litigation in California in the near...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide