News & Analysis as of

Intrinsic Evidence Expert Testimony

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Bracco Diagnostics Inc. v. Maia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Stipulating to infringement after a contrary claim construction is a conventional stratagem for a losing party to have a final judgment that can be challenged before the Federal Circuit.  The risk of course, is that if the...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. University of Wyoming Research Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Interferences were rendered unnecessary with the passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act in 2011, but they linger in disputes between patents and applications claiming priority to applications filed before the change...more

Knobbe Martens

Not a Cowboy Claim Construction, University of Wyoming’s Patent Adequately Defined Claim Term

Knobbe Martens on

CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING RESEARCH - Before Newman, Lourie, and Schall. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Intrinsic evidence is sufficient support for claim construction in an...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide