News & Analysis as of

MATS Mercury Clean Air Act

Jones Day

EPA Proposes Repeal of 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards Amendments

Jones Day on

On June 11, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") announced a proposed rule to repeal key amendments to the 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards ("MATS") for coal- and oil-fired electric utility steam...more

Jones Day

EPA Proposes Stricter Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Power Plants

Jones Day on

The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has announced a new proposed rule that would strengthen the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ("NESHAP") for Coal- and Oil- Fired Electric Utility Steam...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

Will We Ever Stop Overestimating the Cost of Complying with Environmental Regulations?

Earlier this week, Greenwire (subscription required) had an interesting story about the role that EPA’s estimate of the cost to comply with the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule played in the politics and judicial review...more

Jackson Walker

Trying to Thread a Very Fine—and Possibly Non-Existent—Needle: EPA Proposes to Withdraw a Necessary Underpinning of the Mercury...

Jackson Walker on

In December 2011, the EPA announced the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), commonly referred to as the MATS rule. The MATS rule governs the emission of mercury from electric power...more

Burr & Forman

EPA Proposes Revising Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for Power Plants

Burr & Forman on

On December 27, EPA proposed to revise the cost finding associated with the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) along with the risk and technology review required by the Clean Air Act. (EPA Announcement)....more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards: U.S. Senator Carper Letter to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

United States Senator Tom Carper (D-Del.) sent a December 13th letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs: . . . expressing grave concerns regarding the...more

Williams Mullen

Mercury Rule Moves Forward

Williams Mullen on

The federal lawsuit filed by twenty-three states challenging EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) is in the 8th inning, and things are not looking good for the challengers. Some background is appropriate. ...more

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

Stop the Presses! EPA Still Thinks that the MATS Rule Is a Good Idea

Last week, EPA issued its “Supplemental Finding”, confirming that it still believes that its Mercury and Air Toxics Standards are “appropriate and necessary.” I don’t have much to add to our post at the time of the proposed...more

Kilpatrick

The EPA Gets a First Big Win at the Supreme Court in the Post-Scalia Era

Kilpatrick on

On March 3, 2016 the Supreme Court denied an application by Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette and several other states for a stay of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (“MATS”) – a...more

Lewitt Hackman

Supreme Court Tells EPA Cost Does Matter

Lewitt Hackman on

The Environmental Protection Agency's Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) placed national limits on mercury and other toxic emissions from power plants. The agency projected MATS to prevent 11,000 premature deaths, 4,700...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Supreme Court Rejects EPA Mercury Emissions Rule

On June 29, 2015, the Supreme Court cast serious doubt upon the future of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (“MATS”) by finding that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) failed to adequately consider the costs of...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

The Supreme Court Strikes Down the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards

Latham & Watkins LLP on

While the Court’s decision marks a symbolic defeat for EPA, it may not significantly alter power plant operators’ compliance efforts. In a much anticipated decision delivered on the last day of the term, the Supreme...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court: EPA Must Consider Cost Of Implementing Regulations

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court today ruled that the EPA acted unreasonably when it refused to consider the cost of implementing its Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS). The MATS rule, issued in 2012,...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide