News & Analysis as of

Misleading Statements › Fraud › Supreme Court of the United States

Benesch

Fraud by Omission? How Thompson v. United States Could Narrow the Reach of the Federal Wire, Mail, and Bank Fraud Statutes

Benesch on

The vast majority of federal white-collar fraud enforcement actions are prosecuted under the wire, mail, or bank fraud statutes.  18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, and 1344. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Thompson v. United...more

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,...

U.S. Supreme Court Draws the Line: Misleading Statements Aren’t Always False

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,... on

Last week a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in Thompson v. United States, 2025 WL 876266 (2025), holding that a statement that is literally true but allegedly misleading, is not a “false statement” under 18...more

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints

The Supreme Court Solidifies the Securities Act’s Tracing Requirement For Section 11 Plaintiffs

Mintz - Securities Litigation Viewpoints on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court solidified the “tracing” requirement for private plaintiffs to be able to assert Section 11 claims pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, holding that plaintiffs asserting such securities...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide