News & Analysis as of

Misrepresentation Appellate Courts

Perkins Coie

Appellate Courts Issue Reasonable Consumer Defense Wins in Food Litigation Cases

Perkins Coie on

The appellate courts for the second and ninth circuits recently issued rulings reinforcing the reasonable consumer standard. In doing so, these cases refine prior precedent and strengthen a court’s ability to properly dismiss...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Well Water/Sale of Residence: Ohio Appellate Court Addresses Failure to Disclose/Fraud Issue

The Court of Appeals of Ohio (“Court”) addressed in a June 12th Opinion an issue involving an alleged fraudulent misrepresentation made by the seller of a home involving contamination of its well water. See Enger v. Black,...more

Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP

No Need to Disclose “Unsolicited, Inexpert, Premature and Unreliable” Opinions

Overview- The Court of Appeal for Ontario has confirmed that a public company acted properly and lawfully when it decided not to disclose to the investing public an opinion received from an external consultant that...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - April 2022

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Cases in our April Insurance Update address several questions: •Are costs incurred to comply with a subpoena covered? •What must an insured show to rebut the presumption of prejudice in a late notice situation? •What...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - October 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

Here’s our October Insurance Update. The Sixth Circuit had insurance on its mind this past month. Three of the decisions we discuss in our update are from that court. First, the Sixth Circuit joins the Eighth and...more

Rivkin Radler LLP

Insurance Update - May 2021

Rivkin Radler LLP on

We bring you our May Insurance Update. In this month’s update: •The Minnesota Supreme Court considers an issue of first impression over the reasonableness of settlement agreements that fail to allocate between covered and...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

Should Every Maryland Lawyer Who Commits A Dishonest Act Be Disbarred?

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

Maryland is harsh on lawyers who commit dishonest acts. Since Attorney Grievance Commission v. Vanderlinde, 773 A.2d 463 (Md. 2001), the Court of Appeals has stated many times that the presumptive sanction for dishonest acts...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide