News & Analysis as of

Motion For New Trial Patent Infringement

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Vectura Ltd. v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Trial courts tend to get more than the benefit of the doubt when their decisions are viewed under the "abuse of discretion" standard, and juries similarly are affirmed unless there isn't substantial evidence supporting their...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Only an Expert Can Offer Opinions on Obviousness

In a precedential decision in HVLPO2, LLC v. Oxygen Frog, LLC, the Federal Circuit held that non-expert testimony on obviousness is inadmissible, further finding that the district court abused its discretion by allowing a lay...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

HVLPO2, LLC v. Oxygen Frog, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Expert witness testimony is a frequent (almost ubiquitous) feature of patent litigation, if only because questions of the state of the art or the understanding of one having ordinary skill in the art are almost always at...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC

Robins Kaplan LLP on

AFTER A FIVE-DAY JURY TRIAL FINDING NON-INFRINGEMENT, PLAINTIFF’S RULE 59(E) MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL WAS DENIED. Case Name:Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC, No. 17-205-CFC, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213415 (D. Del. Dec. 11,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Satellite Science? No, Just a Damage Award Supported by Substantial Evidence

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants’ motion for a new trial on damages, finding that the jury verdict on damages was based on...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Obviousness Take Two

McDermott Will & Emery on

Finding that the district court improperly restricted a defendant’s ability to present the jury with relevant evidence of invalidity after a prior remand, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Licensor’s Non-Material Breach Doesn’t Excuse Royalties Non-Payment

The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed denial of a licensee’s motion for a new trial, finding that there was no error in awarding damages to the plaintiff/licensor for the licensee’s failure to pay royalties...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Circuit Court Cases - July 2018 #2

PATENT CASE OF THE WEEK - Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2016-2691, 2017-1875 (Fed. Cir. July 3, 2018) - The Court affirmed a jury verdict of patent infringement and vacated a...more

Knobbe Martens

01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Systems, Inc.

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Newman, Mayer, and Stoll. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Summary: While there is not a “practicing the prior art” defense to literal...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - February 2018

Knobbe Martens on

Improperly Drafted Employment Agreement Leads to Dismissal of Patent Case Due to Lack of Standing - In Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Appeal Nos. 2016-2309, 2016-2310, 2016-2311, the Federal...more

Knobbe Martens

Exmark Manufacturing Company v. Briggs & Stratton Power

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Wallach, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. Summary: Reexaminations of patents confirming validity are not dispositive of...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide