News & Analysis as of

Motion to Dismiss › Voicemail

Troutman Amin LLP

PLAUSIBLE: Court Holds Allegations of “Identical” Voicemails Sufficient Allegation of Prerecorded Call Usage

Troutman Amin LLP on

The TCPA’s ban on “prerecorded or artificial” voice calls has often been applied to prerecorded or artificially-generated voicemails. Remains unclear to me whether that is the proper application of the statute– the TCPA...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

California Federal Court Dismisses TCPA Complaint Finding Recruitment Messages Are Not Solicitations

Troutman Pepper Locke on

In a recent ruling, a U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted a defendant’s motion to dismiss a complaint brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The complaint alleged that the...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Ohio Federal Court Finds Plaintiff Has Standing in TCPA Case Over Messages Left With Wrong Recipient

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On June 28, a magistrate judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio issued a report recommending that the defendant’s motion to dismiss be denied because the plaintiff had standing under the Telephone...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Second District Court in the Nation Holds That a Ringless Voicemail is a “Call” Under the TCPA

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Back in July of last year, a Michigan Western District Court became the first court in the country to hold that a “ringless” voicemail—technology which “deposits” a voicemail into a consumer’s voice mail box without actually...more

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,...

Seventh Circuit Holds Voice Mail Message Is A Communication

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,... on

The Seventh Circuit has held that a voice mail message left for a consumer is a “communication” under the FDCPA. In Hart v. Credit Control, LLC, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18375 (11th Cir. Sept, 22, 2017), the debt collector left...more

Burr & Forman

Eleventh Circuit: Voicemail Constitutes Communication Under the FDCPA, But Disclosure of Individual’s Identity Is Not Required

Burr & Forman on

In a case of first impression, the Eleventh Circuit recently held that a voicemail constitutes a “communication” under the FDCPA, and can thus trigger the mini-Miranda requirement, but an individual collecting on behalf of a...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide