News & Analysis as of

Negligent Misrepresentation Borrowers

Blank Rome LLP

California’s Highest Court Confirms Lenders Owe No Duty to Borrowers to Process, Review, and Respond to Loan Modification...

Blank Rome LLP on

Financial institutions, lenders, and servicers should take note that the California Supreme Court affirmed a Court of Appeal decision confirming there is no duty for a lender to “process, review and respond carefully and...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending October 23, 2020

Carlton Fields on

Financial Services Update - FCRA: borrower failed to state claim for violation of FCRA based upon alleged fraud/forgery of underlying loan document, which was a legal defense to foreclosure action and not a factual...more

A&O Shearman

Lender under no duty to advise borrower about onerous term in loan agreement

A&O Shearman on

A lender did not owe a contractual or tortious duty to advise a borrower about a potentially onerous clause in a loan agreement. The clause in question made the borrower liable for the lender’s hedging break costs if the...more

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Promises to Keep—Lender Beware: California Supreme Court Expands Parol Evidence Fraud Exception

In 1935, the California Supreme Court in Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass’n v. Pendergrass prohibited a borrower from introducing external or parol evidence to demonstrate fraud in connection with an agreement...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide