News & Analysis as of

New Evidence Prior Art Patents

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

PTAB: Inadvertent Mistake in Analysis of Experimental Data that Substantially Impacts Proceeding Cannot be Corrected

The PTAB recently denied a motion to correct clerical mistakes under 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c) because the corrections presented substantive new evidence that would have had a substantial impact on the proceedings and prejudiced...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - December 2019

Knobbe Martens on

Specification’s Narrow Description of the Invention Results in Disavowal of Claim Scope - In Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. v. ITC., Appeal No. 18-2191, the consistent description in the specification of a particular...more

Jones Day

PTAB Grants Rare Request For Live Witness Testimony In IPR

Jones Day on

While PTAB proceedings are ordinarily decided “on the papers,” in certain rare cases the Board will permit live witness testimony at the oral hearing. The Board’s precedential decision in K-40 v. Escort explains that...more

Knobbe Martens

Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Iancu

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Reyna, Bryson, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A petitioner in an Inter Partes Review may introduce new evidence not included in its petition if: 1)...more

Knobbe Martens

Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Moore, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A party in an inter partes review proceeding may not present new evidence or arguments at oral...more

5 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide