News & Analysis as of

New Trial JMOL

McDermott Will & Emery

Multiplying Claim Requirements After Trial Makes Things Impermissibly Complex (Wi-LAN, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.)

McDermott Will & Emery on

After a jury found non-infringement and invalidity of two asserted patent claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of the patent owner’s judgment as a matter of law (JMOL)...more

Morris James LLP

Post-Trial Relief Is Denied Except For The Calculation Of Pre-Judgment Interest

Morris James LLP on

The disputed technology relates to using internet technology to route calls through a network. A 6-day jury trial took place in October 2014 resulting in a jury verdict for plaintiff. The court finds there was sufficient...more

Morris James LLP

Post-Trial JMOL And New Trial Motions Are Granted In Part

Morris James LLP on

Robinson, J. Defendant’s JMOL and new trial motions regarding the ‘081 and ‘686 patents is denied. Its JMOL and new trial motion relating to the second trial is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s JMOL motion as...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Opinion Underlying JMOL May Still Provide Basis for a New Trial, Even if JMOL Is Defective

Medisim Ltd. v. BestMed LLC - Addressing preservation of the right to submit post-trial motions, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a lower court’s rulings on judgment as a matter of law (JMOL)...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide