News & Analysis as of

OEHHA Consumer Product Companies

BCLP

More Changes Under Consideration For Prop. 65 Short-Form Warnings

BCLP on

The California agency that administers Proposition 65 is considering further revisions to the regulations governing the use and format of the short-form warning....more

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.

Proposition 65: OEHHA Proposes Additional Changes to “Short-Form” Warning Option

On June 14, 2024, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) issued a notice proposing additional changes to its Proposition 65 (Prop 65) Article 6 “clear and reasonable warnings” regulations for...more

K&L Gates LLP

California's Updated Proposition 65 Regulations New Short-Form Warnings and More

K&L Gates LLP on

Longtime efforts by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to amend the so-called “short-form” safe harbor warnings for California’s Proposition 65 appear to be nearing completion. On 13 June...more

Downey Brand LLP

Surprising Surge in Sauces Tops Prop. 65 Food Notices in Third Quarter 2023

Downey Brand LLP on

Proposition 65: Quarterly Highlights (October 2023) - Downey Brand’s latest roundup of Proposition 65 Notices of Violation (“Notices”) summarizes Notices filed in the third quarter of 2023. Citizen plaintiff groups filed one...more

Alston & Bird

New Changes to Proposition 65’s Warning Requirements Are on the Horizon

Alston & Bird on

Our Environment, Land Use & Natural Resources Group explains proposed changes to California’s Proposition 65 safe harbor warning language....more

BCLP

Consumer products regulations on the rise for 1,4-Dioxane

BCLP on

In a growing trend to regulate the chemicals contained in consumer products, numerous states are enacting laws and regulations to address the presence of 1,4-dioxane in consumer products. 1,4-dioxane is a synthetic industrial...more

BakerHostetler

What Is a PFAS, and Why Should I Care? Part III - California’s Proposition 65

BakerHostetler on

In Part I and Part II of this blog series, we introduced and discussed per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” which have been recent targets of consumer class actions and...more

Jenner & Block

New PFAS Additions to the Proposition 65 List Friday

Jenner & Block on

Over the past week, several new per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been added to California’s Proposition 65 list. In March 2021, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) selected...more

BCLP

PFAS State Snapshot: California PFAS Regulation

BCLP on

California is one of several states that has started regulating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) in drinking water, consumer products, personal protective equipment (“PPE”), and firefighting foam.  In...more

Downey Brand LLP

Proposition 65: Legal and Technical Implications of Listing PFOA as a Carcinogen

Downey Brand LLP on

On March 19, 2021, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) released a Notice of Intent (NOI) to list perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) as a carcinogen under Proposition 65 via the Authoritative...more

Hogan Lovells

Preliminary injunction issued against new Proposition 65 lawsuits for acrylamide in food & beverage

Hogan Lovells on

On 29 March 2021 the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California entered a significant ruling temporarily halting the filing of new lawsuits by the California Attorney General and anyone else related...more

Perkins Coie

California Regulators Seek to Limit Use of Short-Form Proposition 65 Warnings

Perkins Coie on

On January 8, 2021, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced proposed regulations that would significantly affect how businesses may use short-form Proposition 65 warnings. Proposition...more

Hogan Lovells

California update: OEHHA extends comment period

Hogan Lovells on

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is extending the public comment period for its proposal that lays out what constitutes a Proposition 65 exposure that would require warnings for listed...more

Jones Day

2020 Regulatory Amendments Attempt to Simplify Proposition 65 Warning Obligations

Jones Day on

The Situation: New regulatory amendments to Proposition 65 went into effect on April 1, 2020. These amendments: (i) allow manufacturers, distributors, and suppliers of consumer products to satisfy Proposition 65's warning...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Proposition 65: California Clarifies Responsibilities To Warn Amongst Manufacturers, Distributors and Retailers

The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) recently adopted amendments to California Code of Regulations, section 25600.2 – the section titled “Responsibility to Provide Consumer Product Exposure...more

Perkins Coie

Proposition 65 Labeling Responsibilities Finalized for Intermediary Parties and Retail Sellers

Perkins Coie on

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) issued finalized amendments on January 14, 2020, to California’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. Better known as Proposition 65, the...more

Buchalter

Updates on California’s Proposition 65 for 2020

Buchalter on

New year, same notices! Prop. 65 filings have not slowed down, and predictably, the same chemicals are being targeted by noticing parties. In my survey of notices filed between December 15, 2019 and the present date, there...more

17 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide