News & Analysis as of

Palimony NJ Supreme Court

Fox Rothschild LLP

Appellate Division Applies Moynihan Palimony Decision Retroactively

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Over the years, I have written a lot on palimony cases, both before and after the landmark Maeker v. Ross case that I argued in the New Jersey Supreme Court. On March 8, 2022, I blogged on the Supreme Court’s decision in the...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Do I Need a Lawyer for My Palimony Agreement? Supreme Court Says No!

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The law in New Jersey regarding palimony continues to incrementally evolve, as I have blogged about in the past. A few years ago, I argued the Maeker v. Ross case in the New Jersey Supreme Court....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Palimony Isn’t Alimony – Having A Long Term Relationship Alone Doesn’t Give You A Right To Support

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Many people think that palimony is just alimony with a “P” and that the mere existence of a long term unmarried relationship, where the people live together, is enough to convey some right of support. Having argued the...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide