News & Analysis as of

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter › Section 101 › Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a... more +
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter refers to the types of inventions that can be legally patented. The criteria for patentability varies depending on the jurisdiction. In the United States, for instance, if a researcher discovers a naturally occurring substance, the substance itself cannot be patented. This issue was examined in a United States Supreme Court case, AMP v. Myriad, in regard to the patentability of human genes.  less -
WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Patents That Merely Claim Applying Machine Learning to a New Field of Use Are Not Patent Eligible

WilmerHale on

Stark, J. Sage Products, LLC (“Sage”) challenged a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) decision finding two of Sage’s patents unpatentable. After the original appellee, Becton, Dickinson and Co., withdrew, the Director of...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

Federal Circuit Delivers Blow to AI-Based Patents in Precedential Decision

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP on

On April 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Recentive Analytics, Inc. v. Fox Corp. The Federal Circuit held that the Asserted Patents — which relate to methods of...more

Goodwin

PTAB’s Reversal Sheds Light on Quantum Computing Patents

Goodwin on

Despite its potential to transform the global economy and impact national security, quantum computing has advanced largely outside public scrutiny. Artificial intelligence has dominated public discourse, while quantum...more

Alston & Bird

Patent Case Summaries | Week Ending February 14, 2025

Alston & Bird on

Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon, Inc., No. 2023-1359 (Fed. Cir. (D. Del.) Feb. 10, 2025). Opinion by Reyna, joined by Prost and Taranto. Kroy sued Groupon for patent infringement, asserting thirteen claims. Groupon...more

A&O Shearman

Federal Circuit Upholds Invalidation Of Photo-Tagging Patents Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 And Alice/Mayo

A&O Shearman on

On September 17, 2024, Judges Taranto, Chen and Cunningham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) upheld the invalidation of a patent belonging to Angel Technologies Group, LLC and dismissed...more

Jones Day

Federal Circuit Dismisses Appeals As Moot

Jones Day on

Koss filed a patent infringement suit against Bose asserting the ’155, ’934, and ’025 patents, after which Bose petitioned for inter partes review of all three patents before the PTAB. The district court case was stayed...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - August 2024 #2

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

Mobile Acuity Ltd. v. Blippar Ltd., Appeal No. 2022-2216 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 6, 2024) In its only precedential patent opinion last week, the Federal Circuit confirmed the invalidity of all claims of two asserted patents as...more

Erise IP

Eye on IPRs, April 2024: PTAB’s Analogous Art Finding Upheld by Federal Circuit, Blockchain Gemstone Identifying Process Patent...

Erise IP on

Every month, Erise’s patent attorneys review the latest inter partes review cases and news to bring you the stories that you should know about: Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Analogous Art Finding - As IP Watchdog...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

2023 Federal Circuit Case Summaries - Intellectual Property: Year End Report

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

We are pleased to share Sheppard Mullin’s inaugural “Year in Review” report that collects and reports on most key patent law-related Federal Circuit decisions for 2023. This is a follow up to the quarterly report we...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Section 101 Patent Eligibility Roundup: The PTAB, Cert Petition and My Oscars Picks

Holland & Knight LLP on

Dennis Crouch, famed Patently-O blogger, recently looked at several Section 101 decisions from the PTAB. In his first post, "Four Funerals: Recent 101 Decisions," Crouch analyzes four recent eligibility cases that involve...more

Kilpatrick

4 Key Takeaways | Updates in Standard Essential Patent Licensing and Litigation

Kilpatrick on

Kilpatrick’s Alton Absher and Andie Anderson recently presented “Updates in Standard Essential Patent Licensing and Litigation” at the firm’s annual 2024 Advanced Patent Law Seminar. This full-day seminar featured discussions...more

Knobbe Martens

Current Congressional Attempts at Patent Reform

Knobbe Martens on

In recent years, Congress has considered potential new laws for patent reform, typically changes to the system supported by patent owners.  Two main areas of focus are “Section 101” and the “PTAB.”  ...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Struggling to Master the Alice Two-Step: Search Result Display Ineligible for Patent Protection

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s dismissal of a lawsuit involving two software patents directed toward enhancements to search result displays, finding that both patents claimed...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Senior Circuit Judge Issues Split Decision on Patent Eligibility of Claims Directed to Restricting Access to Computer Files

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

Senior Circuit Judge Bryson of the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation in the District of Delaware, recently granted-in-part and denied-in-part a Rule 12(c) motion for judgment based on patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Should This Be an Alice Two-Step or a Section 112 Enablement Waltz?

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit for lack of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 based on an Alice two-step analysis, with Judge Newman filing a sharp dissent...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Coons and Tillis Introduce Two Bills Intended to Change Patent Landscape

McDermott Will & Emery on

In late June 2023, Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) introduced two bills in Congress that, if enacted, would change the patent adjudication landscape: - The Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Senators Tillis and Coons Once More Attempt to Fix Patent Eligibility

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Patent eligibility is broken. The only semi-cogent arguments that I have ever heard in support of the status quo is that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issues too many broad, vague patents, and that 35 U.S.C. § 101...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - April 2023 #3

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC on

Sequoia Technology, LLC v. Dell, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2021-2263, -2264, -2265, -2266 (Fed. Cir. April 12, 2023) In an appeal from a stipulated judgment of noninfringement and invalidity following an adverse claim construction...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Event] 18th Annual Paragraph IV Disputes - April 19th - 20th, New York, NY

American Conference Institute (ACI) on

Hosted by ACI, 18th Annual Paragraph IV Disputes Conference returns to New York City for another exciting year with curated programming that not only addresses the hot topics, but also puts them within the context of pre-suit...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

[Webinar] The Weird And Evolving Landscape Of Software And Business Method Patent Eligibility - March 9th, 10:00 am - 11:15 am CST

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The interpretation of 35 U.S.C. 101 has been in flux for over a decade. Please join MBHB Partner Michael Borella, Ph.D., as he discusses its latest iteration, how patent eligibility is currently viewed by the USPTO and...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2022 Decisions

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

As part of the recovery from the global COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit took steps to return to normal operations. It began requiring live oral arguments in August 2022 and, by November,...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

PTAB Remains Hostile to Section 101 Appeals

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

There is ample evidence that patent examiner allowance rates vary dramatically from examiner to examiner and art unit to art unit.[1]  This has resulted in the general understanding that there are "easy" examiners and "tough"...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Something New: PTAB Tackles Section 101 Patent Eligibility

Holland & Knight LLP on

It's not often that we write about pharmaceutical patents on this blog, and even less often that we blog here about PTAB decisions. The former is a function of the Federal Circuit's decision in Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

The Mental Process Exception to Patent Eligibility is Remarkably Brainless

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In Liu Cixin's novel The Three Body Problem, the characters create a "computer" from human labor.  Millions of people serve as "bits" and hold up flags to indicate whether they represent 0s or 1s.  These individuals are given...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

In re Smith (Fed. Cir. 2022)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In a ruling that should surprise absolutely nobody, the Federal Circuit rapidly scrapped an appeal of a PTAB decision that affirmed a 35 U.S.C. § 101 rejection of a business method claim.  This is the latest in a series of...more

225 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 9
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide