News & Analysis as of

Patent Invalidity Fitbit

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2018)

Background - Cellspin sued Fitbit and thirteen other defendants in the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,738,794, 8,892,752, 9,749,847, and 9,258,698. The defendants filed a...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Immersion Corp. v. Fitbit, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2018)

District Court Throws Out Haptic Feedback Claims on Grounds of Patent Ineligible Subject Matter - Last week, Judge Koh of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California deemed claims relating to...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom (N.D. Cal. 2017)

Software Patent Directed to Pairing Activity Trackers to a Device Considered Patent-Eligible - In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division), Fitbit, Inc., sued Aliphcom (d/b/a...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide