News & Analysis as of

Patent Marking

Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

To Mark or Not to Mark? U.S. Patent Holders Should Take Time to Carefully Consider Their Patent Marking

It’s never a bad time for companies holding U.S. patents to assess their patent marking strategy and compliance. Patent marking is often neglected or relegated to the marketing team, but it shouldn’t be. Whether what and how...more

Jones Day

Patent Marking and e-Marking in Europe: Maximizing Benefits and Avoiding Pitfalls

Jones Day on

In Short - The Background: Patent marking refers to the practice of indicating on a product that its underlying technology is protected through a patent. As an alternative to traditional patent marking, e-marking displays...more

Holland & Knight LLP

"For Use Under" Patent Marking: When a Claim Only Partially Covers the Product

Holland & Knight LLP on

The Patent Act requires patentees to mark their products with the numbers of any patents that cover that product. Put differently, if you produce a product that would infringe one of your patents, you must mark that product...more

Linda Liu & Partners

Patent Marking in China

Linda Liu & Partners on

[speaker: Mavis WANG] Hello everyone. Today I’d like to talk about the Patent Marking in China. [Take-Away] Different from US, in China, the patent marking is not a requirement for collecting damages for patent...more

Fish & Richardson

Marking and Pre-Suit Damages: What Happens when a Failure to Mark Is Followed by a Period of Compliance with the Marking Statute?

Fish & Richardson on

A question that arises with some frequency in modern patent infringement cases is: Can pre-suit damages be recovered for a time period when the patentee (and any licensee) was in compliance with the marking statute when there...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Benefits of and Best Practices for Protecting Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Inventions as Trade Secrets

We previously discussed which portions of an artificial intelligence/machine-learning (“AI/ML”) platform can be patented. Under what circumstances, however, is it best to keep at least a portion of the platform a trade...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Notice Under § 287 Means Knowledge of Infringement, Not Knowledge of Patent

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court’s finding of liability for infringement that occurred prior to the filing of the action, explaining that notwithstanding the defendant’ admission that...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Federal Circuit Vaporizes Pre-Suit Damages

Section 287 of the U.S. Patent Act gives a patent owner the ability to recover damages for patent infringement in two ways: (1) if a patented article is marked; or (2) if actual notice of infringement has been provided. The...more

Fish & Richardson

Does Section 287(a) Apply to Agreements That Do Not Contain a Patent License?

Fish & Richardson on

When a patentee enters into an agreement with a third party that does not expressly include a patent license (e.g., a covenant not to sue between a non-practicing patentee and a third-party practicing entity), does that...more

Williams Mullen

PODCAST: Williams Mullen's Trending Now: An IP Podcast - How to Preserve Your Intellectual Property Rights with Marking—Part 2:...

Williams Mullen on

On the latest episode of Williams Mullen's Trending Now - An IP Podcast, Janet Cho and Clint Brannon discuss the ins and outs of patent marking, including the benefits and risks of marking, and give some practical advice on...more

Chambliss, Bahner & Stophel, P.C.

Shout It From the Rooftops: The Ins and Outs of Patent Marking

A patent owner may recover monetary damages for up to six years of retroactive patent infringement. However, subject to certain exceptions described below, damages do not begin to accrue until the alleged infringer has been...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Failure to Mark Can Put Damages Underwater

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that patented articles must be marked in order for the patentee to recover pre-notification or pre-complaint damages. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)

The patent marking statute, codified at 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) appears straightforward: Patentees, and persons making, offering for sale, or selling within the United States any patented article for or under them, or importing...more

Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC

Patent Marking

Labeling a patented product with a patent number is called “patent marking.” There is no requirement to mark your patented products, however, failure to mark can limit the amount of money (damages) you would be awarded in a...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Read the Fine Print When Using Product Literature for Marking

In the last issue, we discussed patent marking basics and issues related to licensee marking. A recent district court summary judgment decision provides another reminder regarding licensee marking and whether marking product...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Patent Marking Basics

After investing time and resources to obtain patent protection, consumer product companies should maximize their return through a well-executed patent marking plan. The details of an effective marking program must be...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Arctic Cat: A Chilly Reminder Regarding Licensee Marking

In order to make the most of a patent investment, consumer product companies must put competitors on notice of their patent rights. Specifically, a patentee who makes or sells a patented article must mark their articles or...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

The Goods on IP - January 2018

The January 2018 issue of Sterne Kessler's The Goods on IP® discusses interesting patent marking considerations for consumer product companies, including a recent Federal Circuit case involving licensee marking. This issue...more

Knobbe Martens

Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summaries - Before Moore, Plager, and Stoll. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Summary: In challenging compliance with the marking requirement of §...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Fresh From the Bench: Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit

Arctic Cat v. Bombardier deals with obviousness, patent marking, reasonable royalties, willfulness and enhanced damages. The panel affirms all of the district court’s rulings other than as to patent marking, which it remands...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Patent Marking

Fenwick & West LLP on

Labeling your product with information about patent(s) that cover that product is called “patent marking” and is one way to inform the public about your IP rights. While under U.S. law you aren’t required to mark your...more

21 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide