News & Analysis as of

Patents Congressional Intent

Womble Bond Dickinson

Industry Reactions to In re Cellect Decision

Womble Bond Dickinson on

An August 2023 decision from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals highlighted potential new fragilities in the patent portfolios of many industry giants, especially those in the pharmaceutical industry....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Arthrex Files Certiorari Petition in Arthrex case (Second Petition)

Arthrex recently filed a(nother) certiorari petition with the Supreme Court, this time in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., which has also been the subject of petitions from the U.S. government and Smith & Nephew.  (This...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Whither (more likely wither) CBMs

Fenwick & West LLP on

Under the America Invents Act, the USPTO is to stop accepting petitions for review of covered business method patents after September 16, 2020. Given the various other priorities Congress will be dealing with between now and...more

International Lawyers Network

Can Appointment of Administrative Patent Judges be Unconstitutional?

For the Patent and Trial Appeal Board (“PTAB”), the Administrative Patent Judges (“APJs”) are appointed by the Secretary of Commerce in consultation with the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  For an...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

PTAB Strategies and Insights - June 2019: Supreme Court Eliminates Government as a Party Who Can File AIA Action at PTAB

In Return Mail, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Serv., 17-1594, Justice SOTOMAYOR wrote for the majority to overturn a Federal Circuit decision that the U.S. Postal Service had standing to petition for covered business method review. The...more

Jones Day

Federal Agencies May Not Challenge Patents in AIA Post-Issuance Proceedings

Jones Day on

The Supreme Court ruled in Return Mail that a federal agency is not a "person" who may challenge an issued patent in inter partes review, post-grant review, or CBM review under the AIA. In its 6–3 decision in Return Mail,...more

Williams Mullen

Supreme Court Holds that Government Agencies May Not Use AIA Proceedings to Challenge Patents

Williams Mullen on

On June 10, 2019 the United States Supreme Court held in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, 587 U.S. ____ (2019) that agencies of the federal government cannot challenge the validity of a patent via USPTO...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

High Court Says Federal Agencies Cannot Seek AIA Patent Challenges

Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit’s finding that the government is a “person” eligible to petition for post-issuance AIA review proceedings. This 6-3 decision, Return Mail, Inc....more

Knobbe Martens

In Re: Power Integrations, Inc.

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Summary - Before O’Malley, Bryson, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: A writ of mandamus cannot be used as an alternative means of obtaining appellate review of...more

Knobbe Martens

The Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe is not entitled to Sovereign Immunity at the PTAB

Knobbe Martens on

The PTAB dismissed the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe’s attempt to avoid IPR of patents covering Restasis®, which Allergan transferred to the Tribe in a highly publicized patent deal. See Allergan and the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

TC Heartland: The Impact of Updating Patent Venue Rules

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The United States Supreme Court has been chipping away at patent rights for the past decade. The latest blow occurred on May 22, 2017, when the Court crippled the ability of patent holders to engage in forum shopping in TC...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Supreme Court Restricts Where Patent Cases Can Be Filed

TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, Case No. 16-341 (May 22, 2017) In an 8-0 opinion written by Justice Thomas (Justice Gorsuch did not participate), the ?Supreme Court rules that a defendant “resides” for...more

Snell & Wilmer

Unanimous Supreme Court Decision Limits Venue in Patent Infringement Suits

Snell & Wilmer on

In yet another unanimous intellectual property decision, the United States Supreme Court recently held in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC that “reside,” as used in the patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. §...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide