News & Analysis as of

Patents › En Banc Review › Appellate Courts

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Has There Been A Sea Change in Eligible Domestic Industries at the ITC That Will Last?

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

For decades, the ITC’s jurisdictional requirement – known as the domestic industry requirement – effectively shut out innovators from availing themselves of the powerful remedies of the forum, in the form of an exclusion...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

Federal Circuit Denies Teva’s Request for En Banc Rehearing in Orange Book Patent Dispute

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. on

In our previous articles, we reported that the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision on December 20, 2024 ordering Teva Pharmaceuticals (“Teva”) to delist certain patents related to Teva’s ProAir® HFA...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Federal Circuit Revamps Obviousness Test for Design Patents

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a recent en banc panel decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overruled a decades-old test for obviousness of design patents. Reasoning that the old test was “improperly rigid,” the Federal Circuit...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

[Webinar] Federal Circuit IP Appeals: Summaries of Key 2023 Decisions - January 23rd, 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

Directors Michael Joffre, Ph.D., William H. Milliken, Anna G. Phillips, and Richard A. Crudo will present the webinar "Federal Circuit IP Appeals: Summaries of Key 2023 Decisions" on Tuesday, January 23, 2024, at 1:00 p.m....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Hulu, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2020)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

Last week, in Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Hulu, LLC, the Federal Circuit ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may consider patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for substitute claims.  The appeal raises issues of finality...more

Haug Partners LLP

Uniloc v. Hulu - Federal Circuit Clash over Scope of PTAB Review of Substitute Claims

Haug Partners LLP on

WHAT DO WE KNOW? 1. On July 22, 2020, a sharply split Federal Circuit panel held that “[t]he PTAB correctly concluded that it is not limited by § 311(b) in its review of proposed substitute claims in an IPR, and that it...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide