News & Analysis as of

Patents › Hatch-Waxman › Internal Revenue Service

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Tax Bytes: Week of March 24, 2025

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Tax developments - Actavis and deductible expenses - On March 21, 2025, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released a decision in Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. v. United States, holding that taxpayers could...more

Fenwick & West LLP

A Recent Tax Ruling Has Made ANDA Litigation Less Burdensome for Generics

Fenwick & West LLP on

In Actavis v. U.S., a case at the intersection of tax law and patent law, the Federal Circuit held that generic drug companies’ Hatch-Waxman litigation expenses are “ordinary and necessary business expenses” and can be...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Third Circuit holds patent infringement fees do not facilitate ANDA approval

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

In an opinion released July 27, 2023, the Third Circuit affirmed a 2021 Tax Court decision upholding a pharmaceutical company’s immediate deduction of patent defense litigation costs in suits brought under the Hatch-Waxman...more

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP

Hatch-Waxman Litigation Costs Both Capital Expenditures And Ordinary Business Expenses

Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP on

Under the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) Section 162, ordinary and necessary business expenses are deductible, but Code Section 263 disallows a deduction for capital expenditures (“no deduction shall be allowed” for a capital...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide