News & Analysis as of

Patents › Insubstantial Differences Test › Summary Judgment

McDermott Will & Emery

Equivalence Requires Element-by-Element Proof With Linking Argument

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court determination that a patent owner had not provided the “particularized testimony and linking argument” required to demonstrate equivalence under the...more

1 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide