News & Analysis as of

Patents Netflix Patent Infringement

Kaufman & Canoles

K&C Sports & Entertainment Law Weekly Roundup - November 2024 #3

Kaufman & Canoles on

A commercial affiliate of the Major League Baseball Players Association settled a lawsuit with FanDuel on Friday over the alleged unauthorized use of the names and images of MLB players on its sports betting platform....more

Jones Day

PTAB Terminates Institution in Netflix v. ???

Jones Day on

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently dismissed and terminated inter partes review challenging claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,495,167 (“the ’167 patent”). Netflix, Inc. v. Owner, IPR2022-01568, Paper 29 (PTAB March...more

Weintraub Tobin

(Podcast) The Briefing: Netflix to Pay $2.5M to GoTV for Patent Infringement

Weintraub Tobin on

Netflix has been ordered to pay GoTV Streaming $2.5 Million in damages for infringing one of its wireless technology patents. Scott Hervey and Eric Caligiuri discuss this update on this episode of The Briefing....more

Weintraub Tobin

The Briefing: Netflix to Pay $2.5M to GoTV for Patent Infringement

Weintraub Tobin on

Netflix has been ordered to pay GoTV Streaming $2.5 Million in damages for infringing one of its wireless technology patents. Scott Hervey and Eric Caligiuri discuss this update on this episode of The Briefing....more

Jones Day

PTAB Not Required to Decode Petitioner Arguments

Jones Day on

In a precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit affirmed two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) patentability decisions, holding that the PTAB did not abuse its discretion by not addressing arguments not clearly presented...more

Jones Day

Insufficient Arguing Below Causes Forfeited Review Above

Jones Day on

Absent exceptional circumstances, the Federal Circuit will generally not consider arguments that a party failed to present in the tribunal under review. In Netflix, Inc. v. DivX, LLC, the Federal Circuit held that IPR...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Last Week In The Federal Circuit (July 25-29): Following The Letter But Not The Spirit Of The Rules

Sometimes just because the rules permit something doesn’t mean doing it is a good idea. As our latest case-of-the-week shows, the result could be an award of attorney fees. Case of the week: Realtime Adaptive Streaming...more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up - October 2021

Fish & Richardson on

This post summarizes some of the significant developments related to patent litigation in federal district courts of Texas for the month of October 2021....more

Jones Day

Deposition Exhibits Allowed With Sur-Replies (Sometimes)

Jones Day on

Under the Board’s rules, a patent owner gets to have the last word in a PTAB proceeding by filing a sur-reply to the petitioner’s reply.  Sur-replies may only respond to arguments raised in the reply, and the “sur-reply … may...more

Foster Garvey PC

Sports & Entertainment Spotlight: Risks of NIL Pitfalls Prove Greater Than ‘NIL’

Foster Garvey PC on

Just two weeks into the name, image, and likeness (NIL) era in college sports, and we are already starting to see not only novel and creative partnerships, but also the emergence of legal gray areas and pitfalls for college...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Fresh From the Bench: Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit

Arctic Cat v. Bombardier deals with obviousness, patent marking, reasonable royalties, willfulness and enhanced damages. The panel affirms all of the district court’s rulings other than as to patent marking, which it remands...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide