News & Analysis as of

Patents Patent-in-Suit

Robins Kaplan LLP

Pharmacyclics LLC v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC - Imbruvica® (Ibrutinib)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Pharmacyclics LLC v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC, Civ. No. 19-434-CFC, 2024 WL 1885677 (D. Del. Apr. 30, 2024) (Connolly, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Imbruvica® (ibrutinib); U.S. Patents Nos. 8,008,309...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Teva Branded Pharm. Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. of NY, LLC - ProAir® HFA (Albuterol Sulfate)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Teva Branded Pharm. Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. of NY, LLC, Civ. No. 23-20964 (SRC), 2024 WL 2923018 (D.N.J. June 10, 2024) (Chesler, J.)....more

Venable LLP

Genzyme Files Complaint Against Sarepta Concerning Gene Therapy Elevidys®

Venable LLP on

On July 26, 2024, Genzyme filed a complaint (“Complaint”) against Sarepta Therapeutics (“Sarepta”) in the District of Delaware. Genzyme Corp. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-00882 (D. Del.). In its complaint,...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Tolmar, Inc. - Invega Sustenna® (Paliperidone Palmitate)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Tolmar, Inc., Civ. No. 21-1784-WCB, 2024 WL 2972832 (D. Del. June 13, 2024) (Bryson, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Invega Sustenna® (paliperidone palmitate); U.S. Patent No....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. - Invega Sustenna® (Paliperidone Palmitate)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., No. 2022-1258, 2022-1307, 2024 WL 1355733 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 1, 2024) (Circuit Judges Dyk, Prost, and Hughes presiding; Opinion by Prost, J.) (Appeal from D.N.J.,...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Salix Pharms., Ltd. v. Norwich Pharms. Inc. - Xifaxan® (Rifaximin)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Salix Pharms., Ltd. v. Norwich Pharms. Inc., No. 2022-2153, 2023-1952, 2024 WL 1561195 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2024) (Circuit Judges Lourie, Chen, and Cunningham presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.; Dissenting-in-part...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Hikma Pharms. USA Inc. - Vascepa® (Icosapent Ethyl)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Hikma Pharms. USA Inc., No. 2023-1169, 2024 WL 3152087 (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2024) (Circuit Judges Moore, Lourie, and Albright presiding; Opinion by Lourie, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Andrews,...more

Jones Day

IPR Estoppel in Action

Jones Day on

Recently, District Court Judge Thomas S. Zilly in the Western District of Washington granted Ironburg Inventions Ltd.’s (“Ironburg”) motion for inter partes review (“IPR”) estoppelpursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2), which...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Overrules Rosen-Durling Test for Design Patent Obviousness as “Improperly Rigid”

WilmerHale on

Precedential and Key Federal Circuit Opinions - LKQ CORPORATION v. GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC [OPINION] (2021-2348, 5/21/24) Moore, Lourie, Dyk, Prost, Reyna, Taranto, Chen, Hughes, Stoll, and Stark - Stoll,...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, C.A. - Xarelto® (Rivaroxaban)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, C.A. No. 23-556-RGA, 2024 WL 359468 (D. Del. Jan. 31, 2024) (Hatcher, M.J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Xarelto® (rivaroxaban); U.S. Patents Nos....more

McDermott Will & Emery

Pay for Delay Is Sometimes Okay

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit against pharmaceutical companies accused of violating antitrust laws by using reverse payments to delay entry of a generic version of a...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc. - Entresto® (Sacubitril/Valsartan)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., Civ. No. 19-cv-201, 2024 WL 384929 (N.D.W.V. Jan. 31, 2024) (Kleeh, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan); U.S. Patents Nos....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Endo Par Innovation Co. v. BPI Labs, LLC - Adrenalin® (Epinephrine)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Endo Par Innovation Co. v. BPI Labs, LLC, C.A. No. 8:23-cv-1953-WFJ-TGW, 2024 WL 730478 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 22, 2024) (Jung, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Adrenalin® (epinephrine); U.S. Patents Nos....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Tolmar, Inc. - Invega Sustenna® (Paliperidone Extended-Release Suspension)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Janssen Pharms., Inc. v. Tolmar, Inc., Civ. No. 21-1784-WCB, 2024 WL 834762 (D. Del. Feb. 26, 2024) (Bryson, J.)  - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Invega Sustenna® (paliperidone extended-release suspension);...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. - Esbriet® (Pirfenidone)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Genentech, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., Civ No. 23-4085 (JXN)(LDW), 2024 WL 939692 (D.N.J. Mar. 5, 2024) (Wettre, M.J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Esbriet® (pirfenidone); U.S. Patent No. 10,118,637 (“the ’637...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

UCB, Inc. v. Mylan Techs. Inc. - Neupro® (Rotigotine)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: UCB, Inc. v. Mylan Techs. Inc., Civ. No. 22-cv-216 (D. Vt. Mar. 8, 2024) (Reiss, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Neupro® (rotigotine); U.S. Patents Nos. 8,246,979 (“the ’979 patent”) and 8,246,980 (“the...more

Goodwin

GSK Sues Pfizer, Pharmacia & Upjohn & BioNTech for Infringing mRNA Vaccine Patents

Goodwin on

​​​​​​​Late last week, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA and GlaxoSmithKline LLC filed suit in the District of Delaware alleging that Pfizer, Pharmacia & Upjohn, BioNtech SE, BioNtech Manufacturing GMBH, and BioNTech US, Inc....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Mallinckrodt plc v. Airgas Therapeutics LLC - INOmax® (Nitric Oxide)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Mallinckrodt plc v. Airgas Therapeutics LLC, Civ No. 22-1648-RGA, 2024 WL 1251260 (D. Del. Mar. 22, 2024) (Andrews, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: INOmax® (nitric oxide); U.S. Patents Nos. 9,770,570...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Endo Ventures Unlimited Co. v. Nexus Pharms. Inc. - Ephedrine Sulfate

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Endo Ventures Unlimited Co. v. Nexus Pharms. Inc., Civ. No. 23-cv-299-BHL, 2024 WL 1254358 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 25, 2024) (Ludwig, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: ephedrine sulfate; U.S. Patents Nos....more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Judge McMahon Rules on Motions in Limine

On January 5, 2024, Judge McMahon (S.D.N.Y.) decided Plaintiff GeigTech East Bay LLC (“GeigTech”)’s and Defendant Lutron Electronics Co. (“Lutron”)’s motions in limine....more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Bausch Health Ireland Ltd. v. Padagis Israel Pharms. Ltd. - Arazlo® (Tazarotene)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Bausch Health Ireland Ltd. v. Padagis Israel Pharms. Ltd., Civ. No. 22-4248 (SRC), 2023 WL 7131809 (D.N.J. Oct. 30, 2023) (Chesler, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Arazlo® (tazarotene); U.S. Patent Nos....more

A&O Shearman

Federal Circuit affirms district court finding of no induced or contributory infringement of generic depression drug

A&O Shearman on

In H. Lundbeck A-S v. Lupin Ltd., Case No. 2022-1194 (Fed. Circ. December 7, 2023), Plaintiffs, H. Lundbeck A/S (“Lundbeck”) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Norwich Pharms., Inc. v. Becerra - Xifaxan® (Rifaximin)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Norwich Pharms., Inc. v. Becerra, Civ. No. 23-1611 (RDM), 2023 WL 7174558 (D.D.C. Nov. 1, 2023) (Moss, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Xifaxan® (rifaximin); U.S. Patents Nos. 7,612,199 (“the ’199...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Eisai R&D Mgmt. Co., Ltd. v. Dr Reddy’s Labs., Inc. - Halaven® (Eribulin Mesylate)

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Eisai R&D Mgmt. Co., Ltd. v. Dr Reddy’s Labs., Inc., No. 22-CV-5950, 2023 WL 7331272 (D.N.J. Nov. 7, 2023) (Chesler, J.) - Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Halaven® (eribulin mesylate); U.S. Patents Nos....more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

Lights, Camera, Action: GoPro’s Section 101 Arguments Head to the Federal Circuit

Today, the Federal Circuit will hear oral argument in Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc., Case Nos. 2022-1654, -1691, once again stepping into complex questions of patentable subject matter pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101...more

580 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 24

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide