News & Analysis as of

Patents Royalties

McDermott Will & Emery

Munich Court Addresses Implementer’s Obligation To Provide Security in FRAND Negotiations

McDermott Will & Emery on

The Munich Higher Regional Court issued a decision concerning the fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) negotiation process and an implementer’s obligation to provide security if a license offer for standard...more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Patent Apportionment: Anything You Say in a License Agreement May Be Used Against You in a Court of Law

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

Over the last several years, the Federal Circuit has increasingly scrutinized patent litigants’ reliance on “comparable licenses” as a means for calculating a reasonable royalty, including whether the license needs to be...more

Proskauer - The Patent Playbook

A Looming En Banc Decision with Potentially Damaging Consequences – EcoFactor v. Google

For anyone following the evolving admissibility standards for expert opinions relating to patent damages, the EcoFactor v. Google case is one to watch. In December 2024, the Federal Circuit granted Google’s petition for...more

Smart & Biggar

When patents expire but royalty payments don’t: contrasting U.S. and Canadian approaches to patent licensing

Smart & Biggar on

How does the expiration of the patents in one jurisdiction impact global royalty payments? This question was addressed by the United States Court of Appeal’s Ninth Circuit in C.R. Bard Inc v Atrium Medical Corporation, Case...more

Fish & Richardson

Introduction to SEP & FRAND Issues

Fish & Richardson on

Imagine your company designs, manufactures, or sells products that implement commonplace technologies like Wi-Fi, 5G, or video streaming. Did you know you might need a license to incorporate these technologies into your...more

BakerHostetler

The Difference Between Theory and Practice: Lighting Defense Group LLC v. Shanghai Sansi Electronic Engineering Company Ltd., et...

BakerHostetler on

You can’t make applesauce out of oranges — and experts may not cook up opinions with contrary facts. In Lighting Defense, the patent damages expert opined that in a “hypothetical negotiation,” the parties would have agreed to...more

DLA Piper

Clarifying the Enforceability of Post-patent Expiration Royalties Under Brulotte

DLA Piper on

A closer look at Ares Trading S.A. v. Dyax Corporation - The August 2024 Third Circuit decision in Ares Trading S.A. v. Dyax Corporation contributes to the discussion of Brulotte and its progeny. Similar to C.R. Bard v....more

DLA Piper

C.R. Bard v. Atrium: The Impact of FDA Approval Timelines on Royalty Payments

DLA Piper on

A case pending in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals highlights the importance of negotiating the term of royalty payments in the license of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-regulated products. This is particularly notable...more

Goodwin

Life Sciences Licensing and M&A Update: Catching Up on Recent Decisions Affecting Commercially Reasonable Efforts Definitions and...

Goodwin on

Recently, the Delaware Chancery Court and the Third Circuit issued three significant decisions on key issues affecting licensing and M&A transactions in the life sciences industry....more

Irwin IP LLP

Royalty Roulette: When Contract Amendments Disconnect the Patent from the Payment

Irwin IP LLP on

Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. v. Insall, 2024 WL 3381286 (7th Cir. July 12, 2024) - The 7th Circuit recently upheld an arbitration award and found that royalties may be collected after the expiration of the related...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review | June 2024

Knobbe Martens on

Reliably Determining Reasonable Royalty Rates from Lump Sum Licenses - In Ecofactor, Inc. V. Google LLC, Appeal No. 23-1101, The Federal Circuit held that license agreements containing a lump sum payment “based on” a royalty...more

McDermott Will & Emery

The $X Factor: Demystifying Damages Calculations

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision to deny a defendant’s motion for a new trial on damages, finding that the plaintiff’s damages expert sufficiently showed that prior license...more

BakerHostetler

Damages Experts: Has the Federal Circuit Lowered the Admissibility Standard?

BakerHostetler on

Damages experts in patent cases have a tough task. They must construct a hypothetical negotiation between the parties that would have taken place just before the alleged infringement started. And the goal of this hypothetical...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Federal Circuit Applies WesternGeco Framework to Expert’s Effort to Seek Royalties Flowing from Customers Overseas

In 2010, Trading Technologies International, Inc. (“TT”) filed suit against IBG LLC and its subsidiary Interactive Brokers LLC for patent infringement. The four patents in question, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,766,304; 6,772,132;...more

Knobbe Martens

Reliably Determining Reasonable Royalty Rates From Lump-Sum Licenses

Knobbe Martens on

Summary:  License agreements containing a lump-sum payment “based on” a royalty rate may provide reliable evidence of a reasonable royalty rate for the licensed patent. EcoFactor sued Google for patent infringement over...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Reasonable Royalty Available for Foreign Activities (But Not This Time)

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision to preclude a patent owner from seeking damages based on method claims infringed outside of the United States but confirmed that reasonable...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

Puma and the Pitfalls of the “Narrow” Exclusive License

8 Puma Biotechnology is the latest victim of standing requirements in patent cases that continue to wreak havoc on plaintiffs’ ability to recover a full measure of damages. In Puma Biotechnology, Inc. v. AstraZeneca...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

CEMCO Can't Get What It Wants, But Probably What It Needs

Earlier this month, I previewed a Federal Circuit oral argument in In re: California Expanded Metal Products Co., No. 2023-1140, where the district court vacated a jury award of a 12 percent royalty and denied a motion for an...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Read the Fine Print: Covenant Not to Sue “At Any Time” Terminated Upon License Expiration

McDermott Will & Emery on

Illustrating the importance of carefully drafting and reviewing language in a covenant not to sue, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the plain language of a covenant permitted a licensor to sue a...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

Judge Gilstrap: For Implementers of SEPs, the Penitent Will Pass

According to Judge Gilstrap in the Eastern District of Texas, obligations to negotiate under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms apply not only to standard essential patent (SEP) holders but to implementers...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

IoT SEP Negotiations: New Players in a Complicated Game

Why should internet of things (IoT) manufacturers prepare to be approached by standard essential patent (SEP) holders? A recent trend suggests that many implementers may soon have to negotiate licenses that implicate...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

A Tale of Two Experts

It was a tough day for opposing patent damages experts in Ecolab Inc. v. Dubois Chemicals, Inc., as Judge Andrews of the District of Delaware granted Daubert motions directed to both experts' reasonable royalty opinions. The...more

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

SEP Licensors and Licensees Become Increasingly Fragmented

In a report by IPlytics, published today, they have confirmed what most in the business already presumed: that ownership of 5G standard essential patents (SEPs) is becoming increasingly fragmented. That means, as each patent...more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: April 2023

Fish & Richardson on

Four subjects stood out in patent litigation in Texas in April 2023: (1) applicability of the customer-suit exception to the first-to-file rule; (2) the level of ties a reasonable royalty methodology must have to the facts of...more

Fish & Richardson

Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up: March 2023

Fish & Richardson on

March's Texas Patent Litigation Monthly Wrap-Up covers decisions addressing post-verdict JMOL, the point at which cases become exceptional, and the standard for amending invalidity contentions, among other issues....more

142 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide