News & Analysis as of

Patents Supplemental Evidence

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - November 2019

Knobbe Martens on

The Appointments Clause: Ensuring That PTAB Decisions Are Subject to Constitutional Checks and Balances  In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Appeal No. 18-2251, the Federal Circuit ruled that, under the then-existing...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Admission of Late Evidence on Public Accessibility of Prior Art - Intellectual Property News

On Thursday of last week in Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. TCL Corporation, the Federal Circuit affirmed two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions (IPR2015-01584 and IPR2015-01600) finding that a single claim in...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Global Patent Prosecution - September 2019: Submission of Post-Filing Data – The Dichotomy between Enablement and Obviousness in...

With the implementation of the America Invents Act and the United States moving to a first-to-file regime, there is greater time pressure to file patent applications than ever before. When patent protection in ex-US...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Dual-Purpose, Patent Analysis Documents Found Immune from Discovery under Work Product Doctrine

In Limestone Memory Systems LLC v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al., the Discovery Master ruled that, under 9th Circuit law, pre-suit, patent analysis documents qualified for immunity from discovery under the work product...more

Jones Day

Delay in Identifying Prior Art Prevents Their Addition to Notice of Prior Art

Jones Day on

In a recent order, Administrative Law Judge Shaw denied in part the Respondents’ Motion to Supplement their Notice of Prior Art. In re Certain Strontium-Rubidium Radioisotope Infusion Systems, And Components Thereof Including...more

Goodwin

Amgen v. Sandoz Appeal: Parties Submit Supplemental Briefing; Court Grants US Extension to File Amicus Brief

Goodwin on

As we previously reported, following the Supreme Court’s June 12, 2017 decision in Sandoz v. Amgen, the Federal Circuit on July 26, 2017, issued an order recalling its October 23, 2015 mandate, reinstating the appeal, and...more

McDermott Will & Emery

“Supplemental Evidence” Versus “Supplemental Information” (CaptionCall, LLC, v. Ultratec, Inc.)

Addressing the requirements to offer supplemental evidence and information, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) denied the patent owner’s requests for authorization to file a motion to submit supplemental...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Redline Detection, LLC v. Star Envirotech, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2015)

The PTAB at the Federal Circuit -- Supplemental Evidence Edition - On New Year's Eve, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's denial of a motion to submit supplemental evidence pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.123(a),...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Petitioners Cannot Respond to Substantive Issue Raised in Preliminary Response - VTech, Inc. v. Spherix Inc.

McDermott Will & Emery on

Addressing whether a petitioner in an inter partes review (IPR) can respond to a patent owner’s preliminary response, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) denied the...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Serial Objections to Evidence Are Not Required if Supplemental Evidence Is Filed and Served

McDermott Will & Emery on

American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. American Vehicular Sciences LLC - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) concluded that a party need not renew an objection to evidence if...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Get Your Prior Art Ducks in a Row Before Filing Your Inter Partes Review Petition

National Environmental Products Ltd. v. Dri-Steem Corp.; PNC Bank National Ass’n v. Secure Axcess, LLC - In two recent decisions demonstrating that amending a petition for inter partes review (IPR) with supplemental...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Prior Art-Related Submissions That Go to the Merits Are Supplemental “Evidence,” Not Supplemental “Information”

McDermott Will & Emery on

FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc. - Addressing whether prior-art-related submissions by a petitioner in an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding are supplemental information under 37 C.F.R. 42.123(a) or...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide