News & Analysis as of

Policy Terms › Duty to Defend › Wrongful Acts

Wiley Rein LLP

Court Holds that Ambiguity of One Endorsement Did Not Mean That Similar Endorsement Must Also Be Ambiguous

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that a retroactive date endorsement limited coverage to $1 million if a claim involved wrongful acts occurring prior...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Court Holds Retroactive Date Exclusion Is Ambiguous Under California Law

Wiley Rein LLP on

A federal district court, applying California law, has determined that an insurer owed a duty to defend because the policy’s retroactive date exclusion was ambiguous in that it could reasonably be interpreted to apply only to...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Insurer Had No Duty to Defend or Indemnify for Lawsuit Refiled During the Policy Period

Wiley Rein LLP on

Applying Illinois law, a federal district court has held that an insurer did not have a duty to defend or indemnify for a lawsuit that was filed and dismissed prior to the policy period and later refiled during the policy...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide