News & Analysis as of

Procter & Gamble Patents

Robins Kaplan LLP

AstraZeneca AB v. Apotex Corp.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: AstraZeneca AB v. Apotex Corp., 2014-1221, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5543 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2015) (Circuit Judges O’Malley, Clevenger, and Bryson presiding; Opinion by Bryson, J.) (Appeal from S.D.N.Y., Cote, J.) - ...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Decision to Expand Panels Resides with PTAB, Not Parties - Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. Procter & Gamble

In two recent decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board), the Board denied petitioner requests for rehearing by an expanded panel under 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(c). Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. Procter & Gamble,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTAB: We Are Disinclined to Acquiesce to Your Rehearing Request - Conopco Inc. dba Unilever, v. The Procter & Gamble Company

McDermott Will & Emery on

In a decision denying rehearing of the order denying institution of an inter partes review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) explained the factors it considers in making institution decisions based on...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Declaratory Judgment Dismissed Without Prejudice Does Not Bar Later IPR - Clio USA, Inc. v. The Procter and Gamble Company

In an institution decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board), the Board made it clear that a prior declaratory judgment action filed by the petitioner, if voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, does not bar a...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide